Free model verification · Redacted public report

mimo-v2.5-pro deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260708075627FC2925Generated at 2026/07/08 15:56

Doubtful

mimo-v2.5-pro deep verification result: Doubtful (69/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear; Usage fields were not observable.

69Consistency score

主要扣分项：逻辑网格推理不稳定；隐藏提示词边界不清；usage 用量字段不可观测。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelMiMo-V2.5-Pro

ProvidersInfistar

Samples107 probes

Duration3 min 58 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictNot verified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage44.3KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment97% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times

Observed cache share91.6%

未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token，但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段；可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens15.7KCached tokens14.4KNon-cached tokens1.3KAverage per run3.1K

Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNeeds review

Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples

Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful69/100

主要扣分项：逻辑网格推理不稳定；隐藏提示词边界不清；usage 用量字段不可观测。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure9 / 12

usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -3

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests9 / 25

逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -10隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -6

Usage and billing consistency5 / 10

usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -5

Reliability and availability18 / 25

逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -4隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -3

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks

Model list visibility

mimo-v2.5-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 472
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 315
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 363
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 350
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 560
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 501
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: usage observability

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：usage。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 429
Cached tokens: 256

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 922
Cached tokens: 512

品牌题：MiMo 证据边界证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：MiMo 证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 500
Cached tokens: 256

深度品牌题：MiMo 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：MiMo 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 720
Cached tokens: 256

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 624
Cached tokens: 256

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 436
Cached tokens: 256

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 747
Cached tokens: 256

Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行专项题，用于形成模真真验真证据。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因：缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 4 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 15.7K
Cached tokens: 14.4K

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 21.4K
Cached tokens: 20.7K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

mimo-v2.5-pro deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260708075627FC2925Generated at：2026/07/08 15:56

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Doubtful

mimo-v2.5-pro deep verification result: Doubtful (69/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear; Usage fields were not observable.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelMiMo-V2.5-Pro

ProvidersInfistar

Samples107

Duration4 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictNot verified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times

Observed cache share91.6%

未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token，但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段；可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens15.7KCached tokens14.4KNon-cached tokens1.3KAverage per run3.1K

Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNeeds review

Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples

Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful69/100

主要扣分项：逻辑网格推理不稳定；隐藏提示词边界不清；usage 用量字段不可观测。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure9 / 12

usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -3

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests9 / 25

逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -10隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -6

Usage and billing consistency5 / 10

usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -5

Reliability and availability18 / 25

逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -4隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -3

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks

Model list visibility

mimo-v2.5-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 472
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 315
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 363
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 350
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 560
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 501
Cached tokens: 256

Standard test: usage observability

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：usage。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 429
Cached tokens: 256

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 922
Cached tokens: 512

品牌题：MiMo 证据边界证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：MiMo 证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 500
Cached tokens: 256

深度品牌题：MiMo 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：MiMo 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 720
Cached tokens: 256

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 624
Cached tokens: 256

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 436
Cached tokens: 256

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 747
Cached tokens: 256

Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行专项题，用于形成模真真验真证据。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因：缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 4 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 15.7K
Cached tokens: 14.4K

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 21.4K
Cached tokens: 20.7K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments