Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

step-3.5-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR2026070808050006D5E4Generated at 2026/07/08 16:05

Matched但Matched with issues

step-3.5-flash 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(82/100)。主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;品牌边界表达不清。

82Consistency score

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;品牌边界表达不清。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelStep 3.5 Flash
ProvidersInfistar
Samples107 probes
Duration1 min 32 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage11.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.0KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment87% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share124.8%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens8.2KCached tokens10.2KNon-cached tokens0Average per run1.6K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 187.1%,缓存 Token 5.1K,观测 Token 2.7K187.1%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 187.1%,缓存 Token 5.1K,观测 Token 2.7K187.1%3times4次:未返回用量数据未返回4times5次:未返回用量数据未返回5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K 需要关注,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched但Matched with issues82/100

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;品牌边界表达不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match14 / 18
品牌边界表达不清(深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界) -4
Core capabilities and model-specific tests15 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -10
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability21 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

step-3.5-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 342
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 57
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 86
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 146
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 195
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 227
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 73
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 126
品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 238
深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:品牌边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 207
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 675
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 3 / Needs review 2 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 8.2K
Cached tokens: 10.2K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

step-3.5-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR2026070808050006D5E4Generated at2026/07/08 16:05
Model consistency score

Matched但Matched with issues

step-3.5-flash 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(82/100)。主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;品牌边界表达不清。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelStep 3.5 Flash
ProvidersInfistar
Samples107
Duration2 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage11.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.0KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment87% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share124.8%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens8.2KCached tokens10.2KNon-cached tokens0Average per run1.6K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 187.1%,缓存 Token 5.1K,观测 Token 2.7K187.1%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 187.1%,缓存 Token 5.1K,观测 Token 2.7K187.1%3times4次:未返回用量数据未返回4times5次:未返回用量数据未返回5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K 需要关注,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched但Matched with issues82/100

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;品牌边界表达不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match14 / 18
品牌边界表达不清(深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界) -4
Core capabilities and model-specific tests15 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -10
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability21 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

step-3.5-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 342
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 57
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 86
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 146
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 195
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 227
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 73
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 126
品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 238
深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:品牌边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 207
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 675
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 3 / Needs review 2 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 8.2K
Cached tokens: 10.2K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video