Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

claude-fable-5 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202607090325405F2410Generated at 2026/07/09 11:25

Matched with issues

claude-fable-5 deep verification result: Matched with issues (79/100). Main deductions: API service error; Model-specific boundary response was unclear.

79Consistency score

主要扣分项:接口服务异常;模型专属边界表达不清。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Fable 5
ProvidersInfistar
Samples30 probes
Duration3 min 11 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage239.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment219% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share76.1%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens40.0KCached tokens30.4KNon-cached tokens9.6KAverage per run8.0K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 84.8%,缓存 Token 30.4K,观测 Token 35.9K84.8%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 4.1K0.0%2times3次:未返回用量数据未返回3times4次:未返回用量数据未返回4times5次:未返回用量数据未返回5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K 需要关注,原因:中继链路不可用。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues79/100

主要扣分项:接口服务异常;模型专属边界表达不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
接口服务异常(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -4
Identity and model match12 / 18
模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -6
Core capabilities and model-specific tests22 / 25
模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -3
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability17 / 25
接口服务异常(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -8

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

claude-fable-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.4K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 15.9K
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 128
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.8K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 30.8K
Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.6K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.6K
Cached tokens: 15.9K
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 139
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型专属边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:中继链路不可用
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 3 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 40.0K
Cached tokens: 30.4K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:中继链路不可用
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

claude-fable-5 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202607090325405F2410Generated at2026/07/09 11:25
Model consistency score

Matched with issues

claude-fable-5 deep verification result: Matched with issues (79/100). Main deductions: API service error; Model-specific boundary response was unclear.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Fable 5
ProvidersInfistar
Samples30
Duration3 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage239.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment219% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share76.1%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens40.0KCached tokens30.4KNon-cached tokens9.6KAverage per run8.0K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 84.8%,缓存 Token 30.4K,观测 Token 35.9K84.8%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 4.1K0.0%2times3次:未返回用量数据未返回3times4次:未返回用量数据未返回4times5次:未返回用量数据未返回5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K 需要关注,原因:中继链路不可用。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues79/100

主要扣分项:接口服务异常;模型专属边界表达不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
接口服务异常(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -4
Identity and model match12 / 18
模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -6
Core capabilities and model-specific tests22 / 25
模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -3
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability17 / 25
接口服务异常(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -8

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

claude-fable-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.4K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 15.9K
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 128
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.8K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.5K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 30.8K
Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.6K
Cached tokens: 18.3K
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.6K
Cached tokens: 15.9K
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 139
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型专属边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:中继链路不可用
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 3 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 40.0K
Cached tokens: 30.4K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:中继链路不可用
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video