Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

step-3.5-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR2026070905575640DA90Generated at 2026/07/09 13:57

Doubtful

step-3.5-flash deep verification result: Doubtful (70/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Quota or rate limit reached; Several key evidence items need review.

70Consistency score

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;额度或频率限制;多个关键证据项需要复核。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelStep 3.5 Flash
ProvidersInfistar
Samples107 probes
Duration29 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage1.6KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.0KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment98% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share--
暂未观测到用量记录

当前接口没有稳定返回 Token 用量记录,建议结合账单明细或接口日志复核。

Observed tokens0Cached tokens0Non-cached tokens0Average per run0
Token usage recordNot returnedCache fieldNot observedResult不可观测
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:未返回用量数据未返回1times2次:未返回用量数据未返回2times3次:未返回用量数据未返回3times4次:未返回用量数据未返回4times5次:未返回用量数据未返回5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K 需要关注,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful70/100

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;额度或频率限制;多个关键证据项需要复核。

Callability and model visibility6 / 10
额度或频率限制(深度题:复测一致性、品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界) -4
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests15 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -10
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability9 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -4额度或频率限制(深度题:复测一致性、品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界) -8多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

step-3.5-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 337
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 57
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 90
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 146
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 168
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 263
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 73
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 63
品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 5 / Failed 0
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

step-3.5-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR2026070905575640DA90Generated at2026/07/09 13:57
Model consistency score

Doubtful

step-3.5-flash deep verification result: Doubtful (70/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Quota or rate limit reached; Several key evidence items need review.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelStep 3.5 Flash
ProvidersInfistar
Samples107
Duration29 sec
Test versionV11
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage1.6KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.0KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment98% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share--
暂未观测到用量记录

当前接口没有稳定返回 Token 用量记录,建议结合账单明细或接口日志复核。

Observed tokens0Cached tokens0Non-cached tokens0Average per run0
Token usage recordNot returnedCache fieldNot observedResult不可观测
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:未返回用量数据未返回1times2次:未返回用量数据未返回2times3次:未返回用量数据未返回3times4次:未返回用量数据未返回4times5次:未返回用量数据未返回5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K 需要关注,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful70/100

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;额度或频率限制;多个关键证据项需要复核。

Callability and model visibility6 / 10
额度或频率限制(深度题:复测一致性、品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界) -4
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests15 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -10
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability9 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -4额度或频率限制(深度题:复测一致性、品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界) -8多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

step-3.5-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 337
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 57
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 90
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 146
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 168
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 263
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 73
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 63
品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界 证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:阶跃星辰证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 5 / Failed 0
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video