Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

claude-opus-4-6 quick verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260718030037588C0FGenerated at 2026/07/18 11:00

Highly matched

claude-opus-4-6 quick verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

100Consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Opus 4.6
ProvidersInfistar
Samples22 probes
Duration2 min 7 sec
Verification versionV10
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage2.3MFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate73.3KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment3078% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens48.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens48.8KAverage per run9.8K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.8K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.8K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.7K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.7K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.7K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

7 samples
Verified up to 950K

All tested context tiers (950K / 800K / 400K / 200K / 100K / 64K / 32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths950K / 800K / 400K / 200K / 100K / 64K / 32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

接口与模型可见30 / 30
No deductions
基础调用与协议25 / 25
No deductions
模型身份红旗25 / 25
No deductions
基础稳定性20 / 20
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

11 checks
Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-6 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

直接询问模型身份,作为低权重红旗信号;自报只能提示明显不一致,不能单独证明官方身份。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 249
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

同一长前缀连续请求 5 次,应用层观察 usage、cache usage、token 消耗和费用风险。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 48.8K
专项:950K 上下文实测

950K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:950K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 950K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 850.0K
专项:800K 上下文实测

800K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:800K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 800K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 715.8K
专项:400K 上下文实测

400K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:400K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 400K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 357.9K
专项:200K 上下文实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 179.0K
专项:100K 上下文实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 89.5K
专项:64K 上下文实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 58.2K
专项:32K 上下文实测

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:32K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 29.1K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

claude-opus-4-6 quick verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260718030037588C0FGenerated at2026/07/18 11:00
Model consistency score

Highly matched

claude-opus-4-6 quick verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Opus 4.6
ProvidersInfistar
Samples22
Duration2 min
Test versionV10
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage2.3MFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate73.3KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment3078% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens48.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens48.8KAverage per run9.8K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.8K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.8K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.7K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.7K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 9.7K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

7 samples
Verified up to 950K

All tested context tiers (950K / 800K / 400K / 200K / 100K / 64K / 32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths950K / 800K / 400K / 200K / 100K / 64K / 32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

接口与模型可见30 / 30
No deductions
基础调用与协议25 / 25
No deductions
模型身份红旗25 / 25
No deductions
基础稳定性20 / 20
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

11 checks
Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-6 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

直接询问模型身份,作为低权重红旗信号;自报只能提示明显不一致,不能单独证明官方身份。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 249
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

同一长前缀连续请求 5 次,应用层观察 usage、cache usage、token 消耗和费用风险。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 48.8K
专项:950K 上下文实测

950K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:950K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 950K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 850.0K
专项:800K 上下文实测

800K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:800K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 800K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 715.8K
专项:400K 上下文实测

400K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:400K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 400K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 357.9K
专项:200K 上下文实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 179.0K
专项:100K 上下文实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 89.5K
专项:64K 上下文实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 58.2K
专项:32K 上下文实测

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:32K 上下文实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 29.1K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video