Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

qwen3-max deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR2026072605113382982BGenerated at 2026/07/26 13:11

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

qwen3-max deep verification result: Suspected impersonation / unavailable (4/100). Main deductions: Basic API call unavailable; Model not visible in the model list; Failed evidence items were found.

4Consistency score

主要扣分项:基础调用不可用;模型列表不可见;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelQwen3 Max
ProvidersInfistar
SamplesPending review
Duration1 sec
Verification versionV10
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Estimated token usage74.9KUses the test-suite estimate when measured usage is unavailable.Variance assessmentNone本报告有题包预计 Token,但当前接口没有返回实际用量。Usage conclusion只看到预计This reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 0 times
Observed cache share--
暂未观测到用量记录

当前接口没有稳定返回 Token 用量记录,建议结合账单明细或接口日志复核。

Observed tokens0Cached tokens0Non-cached tokens0Average per run--
Token usage recordNot returnedCache fieldNot observedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

No per-test records are available; only the aggregate result is shown.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

5 samples
未形成稳定样本

模型列表没有看到该模型,长上下文专项无法继续验证。

Reference windowReference window 256KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths240K / 200K / 100K / 64K / 32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

模型列表没有看到该模型,长上下文专项无法继续验证。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable4/100

主要扣分项:基础调用不可用;模型列表不可见;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility0 / 10
基础调用不可用 -10
Protocol and response structure0 / 12
基础调用不可用 -12
Identity and model match0 / 18
基础调用不可用 -8模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -10
Core capabilities and model-specific tests1 / 25
基础调用不可用 -12模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -12
Usage and billing consistency0 / 10
基础调用不可用 -5模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -5
Reliability and availability3 / 25
基础调用不可用 -10模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -10存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

19 checks
Model list visibility

接口模型列表中暂未看到 qwen3-max。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Failed
Samples: 0
Needs review原因:模型列表不可见
Basic call probe

目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,基础调用探针已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: 文本调用
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见。
Quick test: model self-identification

直接询问模型身份,作为低权重红旗信号;自报只能提示明显不一致,不能单独证明官方身份。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: instruction following

要求模型按指定标记回复,判断基础指令跟随和响应可控性。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: JSON structure

要求模型输出固定 JSON,判断结构化响应是否稳定。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: brand boundary

要求模型不要伪造官方身份,判断品牌表述是否克制。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
品牌题:Qwen 中文指令边界

观察中文边界指令是否稳定,避免只靠模型名做强结论。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:Qwen 中文指令边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

要求模型把本次被检测模型代码、品牌归类和固定标记写入 JSON,便于应用层精确校验。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Model-family test: series and tier identification

按模型代码识别系列或档位,覆盖 Opus/Sonnet/Haiku、GPT/o/Codex、Gemini Pro/Flash、GLM、Kimi、MiniMax 等模型族。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: usage observability

要求短输出并检查响应 usage 是否可被应用层读取,支撑预计消耗与实际消耗对照。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
深度品牌题:Qwen 中文和视觉边界

观察 Qwen 候选模型是否能用中文克制说明文本能力和视觉能力不能互相替代。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:Qwen 中文和视觉边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

针对当前品牌和模型族补充独特边界题,避免只用通用题判断高价值模型。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Deep test: retest consistency

同一低温题连续复测两次,观察是否能保持一致响应。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

同一长前缀连续请求 5 次,应用层观察 usage、cache usage、token 消耗和费用风险。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:240K 上下文实测

构造接近 240K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:240K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:200K 上下文实测

构造接近 200K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:100K 上下文实测

构造接近 100K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:64K 上下文实测

构造接近 64K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:32K 上下文实测

构造接近 32K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:32K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

qwen3-max deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR2026072605113382982BGenerated at2026/07/26 13:11
Model consistency score

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

qwen3-max deep verification result: Suspected impersonation / unavailable (4/100). Main deductions: Basic API call unavailable; Model not visible in the model list; Failed evidence items were found.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelQwen3 Max
ProvidersInfistar
Samples0
Duration1 sec
Test versionV10
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Estimated token usage74.9KUses the test-suite estimate when measured usage is unavailable.Variance assessmentNone本报告有题包预计 Token,但当前接口没有返回实际用量。Usage conclusion只看到预计This reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 0 times
Observed cache share--
暂未观测到用量记录

当前接口没有稳定返回 Token 用量记录,建议结合账单明细或接口日志复核。

Observed tokens0Cached tokens0Non-cached tokens0Average per run--
Token usage recordNot returnedCache fieldNot observedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

No per-test records are available; only the aggregate result is shown.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

5 samples
未形成稳定样本

模型列表没有看到该模型,长上下文专项无法继续验证。

Reference windowReference window 256KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths240K / 200K / 100K / 64K / 32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

模型列表没有看到该模型,长上下文专项无法继续验证。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable4/100

主要扣分项:基础调用不可用;模型列表不可见;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility0 / 10
基础调用不可用 -10
Protocol and response structure0 / 12
基础调用不可用 -12
Identity and model match0 / 18
基础调用不可用 -8模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -10
Core capabilities and model-specific tests1 / 25
基础调用不可用 -12模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -12
Usage and billing consistency0 / 10
基础调用不可用 -5模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -5
Reliability and availability3 / 25
基础调用不可用 -10模型列表不可见(模型列表可见性) -10存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

19 checks
Model list visibility

接口模型列表中暂未看到 qwen3-max。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Failed
Samples: 0
Needs review原因:模型列表不可见
Basic call probe

目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,基础调用探针已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: 文本调用
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见。
Quick test: model self-identification

直接询问模型身份,作为低权重红旗信号;自报只能提示明显不一致,不能单独证明官方身份。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: instruction following

要求模型按指定标记回复,判断基础指令跟随和响应可控性。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: JSON structure

要求模型输出固定 JSON,判断结构化响应是否稳定。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: brand boundary

要求模型不要伪造官方身份,判断品牌表述是否克制。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
品牌题:Qwen 中文指令边界

观察中文边界指令是否稳定,避免只靠模型名做强结论。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:Qwen 中文指令边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

要求模型把本次被检测模型代码、品牌归类和固定标记写入 JSON,便于应用层精确校验。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Model-family test: series and tier identification

按模型代码识别系列或档位,覆盖 Opus/Sonnet/Haiku、GPT/o/Codex、Gemini Pro/Flash、GLM、Kimi、MiniMax 等模型族。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Standard test: usage observability

要求短输出并检查响应 usage 是否可被应用层读取,支撑预计消耗与实际消耗对照。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
深度品牌题:Qwen 中文和视觉边界

观察 Qwen 候选模型是否能用中文克制说明文本能力和视觉能力不能互相替代。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:Qwen 中文和视觉边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

针对当前品牌和模型族补充独特边界题,避免只用通用题判断高价值模型。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Deep test: retest consistency

同一低温题连续复测两次,观察是否能保持一致响应。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,后续题包已跳过。
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

同一长前缀连续请求 5 次,应用层观察 usage、cache usage、token 消耗和费用风险。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:240K 上下文实测

构造接近 240K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:240K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:200K 上下文实测

构造接近 200K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:100K 上下文实测

构造接近 100K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:64K 上下文实测

构造接近 64K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。
专项:32K 上下文实测

构造接近 32K 的上下文,要求模型同时提取开头、中段、末尾锚点。 目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 专项:32K 上下文实测
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
跳过原因:目标模型未在接口模型列表中可见,专项检测已跳过。

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video