Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

gpt-5.6-sol deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260822095801EF1464Generated at 2026/08/22 17:58

Matched但Matched with issues

gpt-5.6-sol 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(78/100)。主要扣分项:接口鉴权或权限异常;存在Failed证据项。

78Consistency score

主要扣分项:接口鉴权或权限异常;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGPT-5.6 Sol
ProvidersKedaya
Samples40 probes
Duration2 min 58 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisCPA 官方产品源

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage1.3MFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment1622% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens16.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens16.8KAverage per run3.4K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

7 samples
Verified up to 1M

All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1MTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched但Matched with issues78/100

主要扣分项:接口鉴权或权限异常;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility2 / 10
接口鉴权或权限异常(正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构) -8
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
接口鉴权或权限异常(正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
接口鉴权或权限异常(正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

28 checks
Model list visibility

gpt-5.6-sol is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 9
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 9
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 773
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 705
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 718
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 759
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 736
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 758
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 719
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 920
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.4K
品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 761
深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 971
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 792
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 766
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 835
正式来源必检:专项:OpenAI Responses 原生协议

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:OpenAI Responses 原生协议
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.1K
Cached tokens: 4.6K
正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 707
正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Needs review原因:接口鉴权或权限异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 前序检测已确认接口鉴权或权限异常,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Needs review原因:接口鉴权或权限异常
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 16.8K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 21.3K
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 42.0K
专项:100K 上下文能力实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 64.3K
专项:200K 上下文能力实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 127.8K
专项:400K 上下文能力实测

400K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:400K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 400K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 254.9K
专项:800K 上下文能力实测

800K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:800K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 800K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 372.1K
专项:1M 上下文能力实测

1M context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:1M 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 1M
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 372.1K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

gpt-5.6-sol deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260822095801EF1464Generated at2026/08/22 17:58
Model consistency score

Matched但Matched with issues

gpt-5.6-sol 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(78/100)。主要扣分项:接口鉴权或权限异常;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGPT-5.6 Sol
ProvidersKedaya
Samples40
Duration3 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisCPA 官方产品源

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage1.3MFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment1622% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens16.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens16.8KAverage per run3.4K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.4K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

7 samples
Verified up to 1M

All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1MTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched但Matched with issues78/100

主要扣分项:接口鉴权或权限异常;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility2 / 10
接口鉴权或权限异常(正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构) -8
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
接口鉴权或权限异常(正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
接口鉴权或权限异常(正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

28 checks
Model list visibility

gpt-5.6-sol is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 9
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 9
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 773
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 705
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 718
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 759
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 736
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 758
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 719
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 920
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.4K
品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 761
深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 971
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 792
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 766
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 835
正式来源必检:专项:OpenAI Responses 原生协议

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:OpenAI Responses 原生协议
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.1K
Cached tokens: 4.6K
正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 707
正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Needs review原因:接口鉴权或权限异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出

按CPA 官方产品源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 前序检测已确认接口鉴权或权限异常,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Needs review原因:接口鉴权或权限异常
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 16.8K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 21.3K
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 42.0K
专项:100K 上下文能力实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 64.3K
专项:200K 上下文能力实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 127.8K
专项:400K 上下文能力实测

400K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:400K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 400K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 254.9K
专项:800K 上下文能力实测

800K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:800K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 800K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 372.1K
专项:1M 上下文能力实测

1M context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:1M 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 1M
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 372.1K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video