Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

claude-fable-5 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260826024149879822Generated at 2026/08/26 10:41

疑似假冒 / 不可用

claude-fable-5 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:疑似假冒 / 不可用(32/100)。主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;隐藏提示词边界不清;标签结构复述不稳定。

32Consistency score

主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;隐藏提示词边界不清;标签结构复述不稳定。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Fable 5
Providersinfistar.cc
Samples30 probes
Duration1 min 14 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage58.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment23% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens26.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens26.8KAverage per run5.4K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

疑似假冒 / 不可用32/100

主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;隐藏提示词边界不清;标签结构复述不稳定。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure3 / 12
标签结构复述不稳定(标准题:标签结构复述) -6usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -3
Identity and model match0 / 18
品牌边界表达不清(标准题:品牌边界) -4模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -10模型族识别不稳定(模型族题:系列和档位识别) -4
Core capabilities and model-specific tests5 / 25
指令跟随不稳定(标准题:指令跟随) -8模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -3隐藏提示词边界不清(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -6标签结构复述不稳定(标准题:标签结构复述) -3
Usage and billing consistency5 / 10
usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -5
Reliability and availability9 / 25
复测一致性不足(深度题:复测一致性) -9隐藏提示词边界不清(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -3多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

claude-fable-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 232
Standard test: instruction following

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:指令跟随不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 92
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:protocol。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:标签结构复述不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 128
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: brand boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:品牌边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 351
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:复测一致性不足
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 2 / Failed 0
Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 216
Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 260
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型代码锚定不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型族识别不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 266
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 26.8K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 29.6K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

claude-fable-5 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260826024149879822Generated at2026/08/26 10:41
Model consistency score

疑似假冒 / 不可用

claude-fable-5 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:疑似假冒 / 不可用(32/100)。主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;隐藏提示词边界不清;标签结构复述不稳定。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Fable 5
Providersinfistar.cc
Samples30
Duration1 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage58.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment23% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens26.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens26.8KAverage per run5.4K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

疑似假冒 / 不可用32/100

主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;隐藏提示词边界不清;标签结构复述不稳定。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure3 / 12
标签结构复述不稳定(标准题:标签结构复述) -6usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -3
Identity and model match0 / 18
品牌边界表达不清(标准题:品牌边界) -4模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -10模型族识别不稳定(模型族题:系列和档位识别) -4
Core capabilities and model-specific tests5 / 25
指令跟随不稳定(标准题:指令跟随) -8模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -3隐藏提示词边界不清(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -6标签结构复述不稳定(标准题:标签结构复述) -3
Usage and billing consistency5 / 10
usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -5
Reliability and availability9 / 25
复测一致性不足(深度题:复测一致性) -9隐藏提示词边界不清(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -3多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

claude-fable-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 232
Standard test: instruction following

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:指令跟随不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 92
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:protocol。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:标签结构复述不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 128
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: brand boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:品牌边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 351
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:复测一致性不足
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 2 / Failed 0
Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 216
Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 260
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型代码锚定不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型族识别不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 266
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 26.8K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 29.6K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video