Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

claude-opus-4-8 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260826024439867C60Generated at 2026/08/26 10:44

Doubtful

claude-opus-4-8 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Doubtful(70/100)。主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;复测一致性不足;模型族识别不稳定。

70Consistency score

主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;复测一致性不足;模型族识别不稳定。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Opus 4.8
Providersinfistar.cc
Samples30 probes
Duration1 min 8 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage61.4KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment18% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens27.3KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens27.3KAverage per run5.5K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.9K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful70/100

主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;复测一致性不足;模型族识别不稳定。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match1 / 18
模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -10模型族识别不稳定(模型族题:系列和档位识别) -7
Core capabilities and model-specific tests22 / 25
模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -3
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
复测一致性不足(深度题:复测一致性) -9多个关键证据项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-8 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 234
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 47
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 53
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 92
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 93
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 185
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 71
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 365
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:复测一致性不足
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 109
Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 186
Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 134
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型代码锚定不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 250
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型族识别不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 232
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 321
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 27.3K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 31.7K
Cached tokens: 1.9K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

claude-opus-4-8 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260826024439867C60Generated at2026/08/26 10:44
Model consistency score

Doubtful

claude-opus-4-8 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Doubtful(70/100)。主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;复测一致性不足;模型族识别不稳定。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelClaude Opus 4.8
Providersinfistar.cc
Samples30
Duration1 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictNot verified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage61.4KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment18% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens27.3KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens27.3KAverage per run5.5K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.4K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 5.9K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful70/100

主要扣分项:模型代码锚定不稳定;复测一致性不足;模型族识别不稳定。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match1 / 18
模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -10模型族识别不稳定(模型族题:系列和档位识别) -7
Core capabilities and model-specific tests22 / 25
模型代码锚定不稳定(模型级题:模型代码锚定) -3
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
复测一致性不足(深度题:复测一致性) -9多个关键证据项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-8 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 234
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 47
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 53
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 92
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 93
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 185
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 71
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 365
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:复测一致性不足
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 109
Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 186
Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 134
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型代码锚定不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 250
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型族识别不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 232
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 321
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 27.3K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 31.7K
Cached tokens: 1.9K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video