Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

gemini-3.7-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202608280322104DAC1AGenerated at 2026/08/28 11:22

Highly matched

gemini-3.7-flash deep verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

100Consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGemini 3.7 Flash
Providersinfistar.cc
Samples32 probes
Duration1 min 15 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisGoogle 官方模型源

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage42.8KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment43% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens13.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens13.8KAverage per run2.8K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.8K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.8K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.8K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability25 / 25
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

22 checks
Model list visibility

gemini-3.7-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 6
API path: /models
Visible models: 6
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 287
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 136
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 175
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 352
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 273
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 396
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 172
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 2.1K
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 353
品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 378
深度品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.2K
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 294
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 290
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 613
正式来源必检:专项:Gemini generateContent 原生协议

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:Gemini generateContent 原生协议
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 102
正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153
正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 155
正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 326
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 13.8K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 20.4K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

gemini-3.7-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202608280322104DAC1AGenerated at2026/08/28 11:22
Model consistency score

Highly matched

gemini-3.7-flash deep verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGemini 3.7 Flash
Providersinfistar.cc
Samples32
Duration1 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisGoogle 官方模型源

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage42.8KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.9KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment43% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens13.8KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens13.8KAverage per run2.8K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.8K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.8K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.8K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability25 / 25
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

22 checks
Model list visibility

gemini-3.7-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 6
API path: /models
Visible models: 6
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 287
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 136
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 175
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 352
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 273
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 396
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 172
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 2.1K
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 353
品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 378
深度品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:Gemini 工具和多模态边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.2K
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 294
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 290
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 613
正式来源必检:专项:Gemini generateContent 原生协议

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:Gemini generateContent 原生协议
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 102
正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:流式 / 非流式一致性
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153
正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:工具调用结构
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 155
正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出

按Google 官方模型源确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:JSON Schema 结构化输出
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 326
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 13.8K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 20.4K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video