Indistinguishable from GPT-6 Astra不算进通过率
Matches all of the official gpt-6.1-sol, gpt-6-astra
These two official models answer almost identically, so we cannot tell which one this is. They are close in ability, but their official prices differ about 5× (gpt-6.1-sol input/output per million tokens $2 / $10; gpt-6-astra $10 / $50). If you are paying the gpt-6-astra price, compare what this provider charges for both.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (含同代近似型号 gpt-6-astra)100/100
Checks10/12 Passed
- Providers
- kduck.top
- Claimed model
- gpt-6.1-sol
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 108 official models
- Requests
- 5
- Duration
- 52 秒
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference108 official models · 2/3 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 2 match gpt-6.1-sol / gpt-6-astra
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- gpt-6.1-sol · gpt-6-astraClaimed model and its near-identical sibling — both match closely>99%
- gemini-3.6-flash<1%
- gpt-6-sol<1%
- qwen-turbo<1%
02Test details
12 items · 10 passed · 2 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes gpt-6.1-sol |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 3 valid | Some samples could not be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the OpenAI GPT family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Exact model undetermined | Matches all of the official gpt-6.1-sol, gpt-6-astra; these models answer almost identically |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage18.4KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage3.0K-90.0KEstimated from this test's requests.DeviationWithin the estimateThe reported usage is within the estimated range.Usage checkMatches the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
gpt-6.1-sol verification report
Indistinguishable from GPT-6 Astra不算进通过率
Matches all of the official gpt-6.1-sol, gpt-6-astra
These two official models answer almost identically, so we cannot tell which one this is. They are close in ability, but their official prices differ about 5× (gpt-6.1-sol input/output per million tokens $2 / $10; gpt-6-astra $10 / $50). If you are paying the gpt-6-astra price, compare what this provider charges for both.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (含同代近似型号 gpt-6-astra)100/100
Checks10/12 Passed
- Providers
- kduck.top
- Claimed model
- gpt-6.1-sol
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 108 official models
- Requests
- 5
- Duration
- 52 秒
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference108 official models · 2/3 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 2 match gpt-6.1-sol / gpt-6-astra
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- gpt-6.1-sol · gpt-6-astraClaimed model and its near-identical sibling — both match closely>99%
- gemini-3.6-flash<1%
- gpt-6-sol<1%
- qwen-turbo<1%
02Test details
12 items · 10 passed · 2 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes gpt-6.1-sol |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 3 valid | Some samples could not be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the OpenAI GPT family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Exact model undetermined | Matches all of the official gpt-6.1-sol, gpt-6-astra; these models answer almost identically |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage18.4KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage3.0K-90.0KEstimated from this test's requests.DeviationWithin the estimateThe reported usage is within the estimated range.Usage checkMatches the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论
编辑器加载中…
发表评论