Identity mismatchSubstitution detected
Does not match the claimed model claude-fable-5-2
行为特征与官方 claude-fable-5-2 不符，最接近官方 claude-opus-5-5。
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (claude-fable-5-2)0/100
Checks12/17 Passed
- Providers
- CodeKey
- Claimed model
- claude-fable-5-2
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 110 official models
- Requests
- 15
- Duration
- 1 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference110 official models · 3/3 Valid
Answer by answer3 answers: 0 match claude-fable-5-2；another 3 look more like claude-opus-5-5
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- claude-opus-5-5>99%
- mimo-v2.6-flash<1%
- gpt-5.2<1%
- kimi-k3<1%
- gpt-5.4<1%
02Test details
17 items · 12 passed · 4 notes · 1 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-fable-5-2 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 3 / 3 valid | All independent samples can be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the Anthropic Claude family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Mismatch | Model match score 0; closest to the official claude-opus-5-5 |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Partly works | On average 78% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price. |
| D-02 | Context length | 128K passed | 32K / 128K: every tier was read in full. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Not supported | 流式请求未成功（接口返回 HTTP 429） |
| D-04 | Tool use | Not supported | 带工具的请求未成功（接口返回 HTTP 429） |
| D-05 | Structured output | Not supported | 结构化输出请求未成功（接口返回 HTTP 429） |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio78.3%
Partly works
On average 78% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price.
Usage this run135.4KCached tokens84.8KNon-cached tokens50.6KAverage per run27.1K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultPartly works
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 128K
32K / 128K: every tier was read in full.
Reference windowVerified up to 128KThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 167.5K received
- 128KRead in full · 120.7K received
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage468.5KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage157.4K-302.3KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation55% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
claude-fable-5-2 verification report
Identity mismatchSubstitution detected
Does not match the claimed model claude-fable-5-2
行为特征与官方 claude-fable-5-2 不符，最接近官方 claude-opus-5-5。
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (claude-fable-5-2)0/100
Checks12/17 Passed
- Providers
- CodeKey
- Claimed model
- claude-fable-5-2
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 110 official models
- Requests
- 15
- Duration
- 1 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference110 official models · 3/3 Valid
Answer by answer3 answers: 0 match claude-fable-5-2；another 3 look more like claude-opus-5-5
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- claude-opus-5-5>99%
- mimo-v2.6-flash<1%
- gpt-5.2<1%
- kimi-k3<1%
- gpt-5.4<1%
02Test details
17 items · 12 passed · 4 notes · 1 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-fable-5-2 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 3 / 3 valid | All independent samples can be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the Anthropic Claude family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Mismatch | Model match score 0; closest to the official claude-opus-5-5 |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Partly works | On average 78% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price. |
| D-02 | Context length | 128K passed | 32K / 128K: every tier was read in full. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Not supported | 流式请求未成功（接口返回 HTTP 429） |
| D-04 | Tool use | Not supported | 带工具的请求未成功（接口返回 HTTP 429） |
| D-05 | Structured output | Not supported | 结构化输出请求未成功（接口返回 HTTP 429） |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio78.3%
Partly works
On average 78% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price.
Usage this run135.4KCached tokens84.8KNon-cached tokens50.6KAverage per run27.1K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultPartly works
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 128K
32K / 128K: every tier was read in full.
Reference windowVerified up to 128KThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 167.5K received
- 128KRead in full · 120.7K received
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage468.5KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage157.4K-302.3KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation55% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论
编辑器加载中…
发表评论