mimo-v2.5 本次深度验真结果：Matched（91/100）。主要问题：同一个问题反复问，答案会变。
主要问题：同一个问题反复问，答案会变。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (8K / 16K / 30K) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：同一个问题反复问，答案会变。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
mimo-v2.5 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 430 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 295 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 519 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 557 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 615 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 2 times: 1 passed, 1 need attention. Why it failed: Retest consistency was insufficient This test used 1.2K tokens of which 448 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 550 tokens of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.1K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 477 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 734 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 833 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 16.0K tokens of which 11.7K tokens were billed at the cache price
8K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 8K This test used 6.0K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
16K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 16K This test used 11.4K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
30K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 30K This test used 20.4K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhenmimo-v2.5 本次深度验真结果：Matched（91/100）。主要问题：同一个问题反复问，答案会变。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (8K / 16K / 30K) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：同一个问题反复问，答案会变。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
mimo-v2.5 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 430 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 295 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 519 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 557 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 615 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 2 times: 1 passed, 1 need attention. Why it failed: Retest consistency was insufficient This test used 1.2K tokens of which 448 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 550 tokens of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.1K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 477 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 734 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 833 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 16.0K tokens of which 11.7K tokens were billed at the cache price
8K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 8K This test used 6.0K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
16K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 16K This test used 11.4K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
30K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 30K This test used 20.4K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论