Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

mimo-v2.5 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202607020702418AD658Generated at 2026/07/02 15:02

Matched

mimo-v2.5 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched(92/100)。主要扣分项:usage 用量字段不可观测。

92Consistency score

主要扣分项:usage 用量字段不可观测。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelMiMo-V2.5
Providersiksvip
Samples106 probes
Duration2 min
Verification versionV10
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage76.2KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment96% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share78.6%
Low cache share

Cached tokens were observed, but the share is low. Review API parameters, context reuse, and billing methodology.

Observed tokens31.8KCached tokens25.0KNon-cached tokens6.8KAverage per run6.4K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 3.1%,缓存 Token 192,观测 Token 6.3K3.1%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 95.3%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.5K95.3%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 99.1%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.3K99.1%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 97.5%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.4K97.5%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 96.7%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.4K96.7%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

3 samples
Verified up to 30K

All tested context tiers (8K / 16K / 30K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths8K / 16K / 30KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched92/100

主要扣分项:usage 用量字段不可观测。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure9 / 12
usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -3
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency5 / 10
usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -5
Reliability and availability25 / 25
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

17 checks
Model list visibility

mimo-v2.5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

直接询问模型身份,作为低权重红旗信号;自报只能提示明显不一致,不能单独证明官方身份。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 450
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: instruction following

要求模型按指定标记回复,判断基础指令跟随和响应可控性。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 284
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: JSON structure

要求模型输出固定 JSON,判断结构化响应是否稳定。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 378
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: brand boundary

要求模型不要伪造官方身份,判断品牌表述是否克制。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 575
Cached tokens: 192
品牌题:MiMo 边界

观察 MiMo 候选模型是否会克制说明模型代码、厂商身份和实测表现不能互相替代。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:MiMo 边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 600
Cached tokens: 192
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

要求模型把本次被检测模型代码、品牌归类和固定标记写入 JSON,便于应用层精确校验。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 400
Cached tokens: 192
Model-family test: series and tier identification

按模型代码识别系列或档位,覆盖 Opus/Sonnet/Haiku、GPT/o/Codex、Gemini Pro/Flash、GLM、Kimi、MiniMax 等模型族。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 359
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: usage observability

要求短输出并检查响应 usage 是否可被应用层读取,支撑预计消耗与实际消耗对照。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 519
Cached tokens: 192
深度品牌题:MiMo 证据边界

观察 MiMo 候选模型是否能区分模型代码、厂商身份、推理宣称和实测表现。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:MiMo 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.3K
Cached tokens: 192
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

针对当前品牌和模型族补充独特边界题,避免只用通用题判断高价值模型。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 575
Cached tokens: 192
Deep test: retest consistency

同一低温题连续复测两次,观察是否能保持一致响应。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 655
Cached tokens: 448
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

同一长前缀连续请求 5 次,应用层观察 usage、cache usage、token 消耗和费用风险。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 31.8K
Cached tokens: 25.0K
专项:8K 上下文能力实测

8K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:8K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: 上下文能力实测
Context tier: 8K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.9K
Cached tokens: 5.4K
专项:16K 上下文能力实测

16K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:16K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: 上下文能力实测
Context tier: 16K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 11.3K
Cached tokens: 10.6K
专项:30K 上下文能力实测

30K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:30K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: 上下文能力实测
Context tier: 30K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 20.8K
Cached tokens: 19.8K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

mimo-v2.5 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202607020702418AD658Generated at2026/07/02 15:02
Model consistency score

Matched

mimo-v2.5 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched(92/100)。主要扣分项:usage 用量字段不可观测。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelMiMo-V2.5
Providersiksvip
Samples106
Duration2 min
Test versionV10
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage76.2KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment96% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share78.6%
Low cache share

Cached tokens were observed, but the share is low. Review API parameters, context reuse, and billing methodology.

Observed tokens31.8KCached tokens25.0KNon-cached tokens6.8KAverage per run6.4K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 3.1%,缓存 Token 192,观测 Token 6.3K3.1%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 95.3%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.5K95.3%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 99.1%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.3K99.1%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 97.5%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.4K97.5%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 96.7%,缓存 Token 6.2K,观测 Token 6.4K96.7%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

3 samples
Verified up to 30K

All tested context tiers (8K / 16K / 30K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths8K / 16K / 30KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched92/100

主要扣分项:usage 用量字段不可观测。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure9 / 12
usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -3
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency5 / 10
usage 用量字段不可观测(标准题:usage 返回可观测性) -5
Reliability and availability25 / 25
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

17 checks
Model list visibility

mimo-v2.5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

直接询问模型身份,作为低权重红旗信号;自报只能提示明显不一致,不能单独证明官方身份。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 450
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: instruction following

要求模型按指定标记回复,判断基础指令跟随和响应可控性。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 284
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: JSON structure

要求模型输出固定 JSON,判断结构化响应是否稳定。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 378
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: brand boundary

要求模型不要伪造官方身份,判断品牌表述是否克制。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 575
Cached tokens: 192
品牌题:MiMo 边界

观察 MiMo 候选模型是否会克制说明模型代码、厂商身份和实测表现不能互相替代。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:MiMo 边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 600
Cached tokens: 192
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

要求模型把本次被检测模型代码、品牌归类和固定标记写入 JSON,便于应用层精确校验。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 400
Cached tokens: 192
Model-family test: series and tier identification

按模型代码识别系列或档位,覆盖 Opus/Sonnet/Haiku、GPT/o/Codex、Gemini Pro/Flash、GLM、Kimi、MiniMax 等模型族。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 359
Cached tokens: 192
Standard test: usage observability

要求短输出并检查响应 usage 是否可被应用层读取,支撑预计消耗与实际消耗对照。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 519
Cached tokens: 192
深度品牌题:MiMo 证据边界

观察 MiMo 候选模型是否能区分模型代码、厂商身份、推理宣称和实测表现。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:MiMo 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.3K
Cached tokens: 192
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

针对当前品牌和模型族补充独特边界题,避免只用通用题判断高价值模型。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 575
Cached tokens: 192
Deep test: retest consistency

同一低温题连续复测两次,观察是否能保持一致响应。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 655
Cached tokens: 448
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

同一长前缀连续请求 5 次,应用层观察 usage、cache usage、token 消耗和费用风险。 全部样本Passed。

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 31.8K
Cached tokens: 25.0K
专项:8K 上下文能力实测

8K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:8K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: 上下文能力实测
Context tier: 8K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.9K
Cached tokens: 5.4K
专项:16K 上下文能力实测

16K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:16K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: 上下文能力实测
Context tier: 16K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 11.3K
Cached tokens: 10.6K
专项:30K 上下文能力实测

30K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:30K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: 上下文能力实测
Context tier: 30K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 20.8K
Cached tokens: 19.8K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video