Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

qwen3.5-plus quick verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260703063220CB4741Generated at 2026/07/03 14:32

Matched

qwen3.5-plus quick verification result: Matched (92/100). Main deductions: API service error.

92Consistency score

主要扣分项:接口服务异常。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelQwen3.5 Plus
ProvidersInfistar
Samples98 probes
Duration3 min 36 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage164.7KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate73.3KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment125% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens15.3KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens15.3KAverage per run3.1K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

6 samples
Verified up to 128K

256K 需要关注,原因:接口服务异常。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths8K / 16K / 32K / 64K / 128K / 256KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

256K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched92/100

主要扣分项:接口服务异常。

接口与模型可见30 / 30
No deductions
基础调用与协议25 / 25
No deductions
模型身份红旗25 / 25
No deductions
基础稳定性12 / 20
接口服务异常(快速题:模型身份自报) -8

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

10 checks
Model list visibility

qwen3.5-plus is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 15.3K
专项:8K 上下文能力实测

8K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:8K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 8K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.5K
专项:16K 上下文能力实测

16K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:16K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 16K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 10.4K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.4K
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 37.9K
专项:128K 上下文能力实测

128K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:128K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 128K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 75.8K
专项:256K 上下文能力实测

256K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 专项:256K 上下文能力实测
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 256K
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

qwen3.5-plus quick verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260703063220CB4741Generated at2026/07/03 14:32
Model consistency score

Matched

qwen3.5-plus quick verification result: Matched (92/100). Main deductions: API service error.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelQwen3.5 Plus
ProvidersInfistar
Samples98
Duration4 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage164.7KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate73.3KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment125% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens15.3KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens15.3KAverage per run3.1K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultNeeds review
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.1K0.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

6 samples
Verified up to 128K

256K 需要关注,原因:接口服务异常。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths8K / 16K / 32K / 64K / 128K / 256KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

256K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched92/100

主要扣分项:接口服务异常。

接口与模型可见30 / 30
No deductions
基础调用与协议25 / 25
No deductions
模型身份红旗25 / 25
No deductions
基础稳定性12 / 20
接口服务异常(快速题:模型身份自报) -8

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

10 checks
Model list visibility

qwen3.5-plus is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Needs review
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:缓存用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 15.3K
专项:8K 上下文能力实测

8K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:8K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 8K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.5K
专项:16K 上下文能力实测

16K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:16K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 16K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 10.4K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.4K
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 37.9K
专项:128K 上下文能力实测

128K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:128K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 128K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 75.8K
专项:256K 上下文能力实测

256K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: 专项:256K 上下文能力实测
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 256K
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video