Free model verification · Redacted public report

glm-5.1 quick verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202607030911250BF6D6Generated at 2026/07/03 17:11

Highly matched

glm-5.1 quick verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

100Consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.1

ProvidersInfistar

Samples97 probes

Duration1 min 55 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage165.5KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate79.1KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment109% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times

Observed cache share72.7%

Low cache share

Cached tokens were observed, but the share is low. Review API parameters, context reuse, and billing methodology.

Observed tokens14.4KCached tokens10.5KNon-cached tokens4.0KAverage per run2.9K

Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal

Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

5 samples

Verified up to 128K

All tested context tiers (8K / 16K / 32K / 64K / 128K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 200KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths8K / 16K / 32K / 64K / 128KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

接口与模型可见30 / 30

No deductions

基础调用与协议25 / 25

No deductions

模型身份红旗25 / 25

No deductions

基础稳定性20 / 20

No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

9 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.1 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 251

Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 14.4K
Cached tokens: 10.5K

专项：8K 上下文能力实测

8K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：8K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 8K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.4K

专项：16K 上下文能力实测

16K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：16K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 16K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 10.1K

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.8K

专项：64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 39.0K

专项：128K 上下文能力实测

128K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：128K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 128K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 76.3K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

glm-5.1 quick verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202607030911250BF6D6Generated at：2026/07/03 17:11

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Highly matched

glm-5.1 quick verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.1

ProvidersInfistar

Samples97

Duration2 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times

Observed cache share72.7%

Low cache share

Cached tokens were observed, but the share is low. Review API parameters, context reuse, and billing methodology.

Observed tokens14.4KCached tokens10.5KNon-cached tokens4.0KAverage per run2.9K

Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal

Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

5 samples

Verified up to 128K

All tested context tiers (8K / 16K / 32K / 64K / 128K) returned reliably.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

接口与模型可见30 / 30

No deductions

基础调用与协议25 / 25

No deductions

模型身份红旗25 / 25

No deductions

基础稳定性20 / 20

No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

9 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.1 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 251

Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 14.4K
Cached tokens: 10.5K

专项：8K 上下文能力实测

8K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：8K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 8K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 5.4K

专项：16K 上下文能力实测

16K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：16K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 16K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 10.1K

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.8K

专项：64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 39.0K

专项：128K 上下文能力实测

128K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：128K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 128K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 76.3K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments