Is x-ai/grok-4.3 genuine? Deep check result
Highly matched
x-ai/grok-4.3 本次深度验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
All primary checks passed in this run.
x-ai/grok-4.3 本次深度验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
All primary checks passed in this run.
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
All primary checks passed in this run.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
x-ai/grok-4.3 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 343 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 647 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 258 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 350 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 424 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 594 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 560 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 353 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 706 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 676 tokens of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 637 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 741 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 530 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 507 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 738 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 15.1K tokens of which 11.1K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 19.0K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 37.6K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 57.7K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 114.9K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 229.4K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
800K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 800K This test used 458.4K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
1M 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 1M This test used 590.9K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhenx-ai/grok-4.3 本次深度验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
All primary checks passed in this run.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
x-ai/grok-4.3 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 343 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 647 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 258 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 350 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 424 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 594 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 560 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 353 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 706 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 676 tokens of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 637 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 741 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 530 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 507 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 738 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 15.1K tokens of which 11.1K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 19.0K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 37.6K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 57.7K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 114.9K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 229.4K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
800K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 800K This test used 458.4K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
1M 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 1M This test used 590.9K tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
发表评论