MiniMax-M3 本次深度验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（77/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
MiniMax-M3 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 323 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 232 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 232 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 277 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear This test used 390 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 372 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 261 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 476 tokens of which 228 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 376 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 710 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 295 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 302 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 568 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 14.9K tokens of which 11.4K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 17.6K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 34.8K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 53.5K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 106.5K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 212.8K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
800K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 800K This test used 425.4K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
1M 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 1M This test used 548.8K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenMiniMax-M3 本次深度验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（77/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
MiniMax-M3 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 323 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 232 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 232 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 277 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear This test used 390 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 372 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 261 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 476 tokens of which 228 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 376 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 710 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 295 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 302 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 568 tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 14.9K tokens of which 11.4K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 17.6K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 34.8K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 53.5K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 106.5K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 212.8K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
800K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 800K This test used 425.4K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
1M 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 1M This test used 548.8K tokens of which 114 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论