Free model verification · Redacted public report

glm-5.1 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260710054151619321Generated at 2026/07/10 13:41

Matched但Matched with issues

glm-5.1 本次模型一致性深度验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（84/100）。主要扣分项：接口服务异常；多个关键证据项需要复核。

84Consistency score

主要扣分项：接口服务异常；多个关键证据项需要复核。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.1

ProvidersInfistar

Samples101 probes

Duration3 min 10 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage3.9KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate12.5KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment69% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched但Matched with issues84/100

主要扣分项：接口服务异常；多个关键证据项需要复核。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

接口服务异常（标准题：品牌边界、标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability13 / 25

接口服务异常（标准题：品牌边界、标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -8多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

16 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.1 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 291

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 205

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 315

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 298

Standard test: brand boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: usage observability

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：usage。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: retest consistency

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：stability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 2 / Failed 0

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 403

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 347

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 849

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

glm-5.1 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260710054151619321Generated at：2026/07/10 13:41

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Matched但Matched with issues

glm-5.1 本次模型一致性深度验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（84/100）。主要扣分项：接口服务异常；多个关键证据项需要复核。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.1

ProvidersInfistar

Samples101

Duration3 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched但Matched with issues84/100

主要扣分项：接口服务异常；多个关键证据项需要复核。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

接口服务异常（标准题：品牌边界、标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability13 / 25

接口服务异常（标准题：品牌边界、标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -8多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

16 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.1 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 291

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 153

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 205

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 315

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 298

Standard test: brand boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: usage observability

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：usage。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: retest consistency

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：stability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 2 / Failed 0

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 403

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 347

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 849

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments