Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260710090626E2C3FAGenerated at 2026/07/10 17:06

Highly matched

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

100Consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProvidersInfistar
Samples103 probes
Duration3 min 10 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage7.1KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment100% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 1 times
Observed cache share--
暂未观测到用量记录

当前接口没有稳定返回 Token 用量记录,建议结合账单明细或接口日志复核。

Observed tokens0Cached tokens0Non-cached tokens0Average per run0
Token usage recordNot returnedCache fieldNot observedResultHigh risk
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:未返回用量数据未返回1times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K Failed,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability25 / 25
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 429
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 46
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 59
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 130
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 223
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 123
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 62
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 4.4K
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 102
品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 169
深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 450
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 170
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 134
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 263
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 检测过程中确认服务类故障,剩余样本和后续检测项已熔断跳过。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260710090626E2C3FAGenerated at2026/07/10 17:06
Model consistency score

Highly matched

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProvidersInfistar
Samples103
Duration3 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage7.1KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment100% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 1 times
Observed cache share--
暂未观测到用量记录

当前接口没有稳定返回 Token 用量记录,建议结合账单明细或接口日志复核。

Observed tokens0Cached tokens0Non-cached tokens0Average per run0
Token usage recordNot returnedCache fieldNot observedResultHigh risk
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:未返回用量数据未返回1times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K Failed,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability25 / 25
No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 429
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 46
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 59
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 130
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 223
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 123
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 62
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 4.4K
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 102
品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 169
深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 450
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 170
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 134
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 263
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 检测过程中确认服务类故障,剩余样本和后续检测项已熔断跳过。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video