Is deepseek-v4-flash genuine? Deep check result

Report ID MZZR20260715052433DB7E35Generated at 2026/07/15 13:24

Highly matched

deepseek-v4-flash 本次深度验真结果：Highly matched（100/100）。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。

100Model consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash

ProvidersConeverse AI

Requests30

Duration6 min 35 sec

Identity verdictVerified

ReferenceMozhenzhen's own test standard

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage873.3KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage1.7MEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation48% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Token cache usage test

Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.

Total 5 request

Share billed at the cache rate0.0%

No cache discount this time

The endpoint reported real usage but no cached part; this seller may not offer cache pricing, or nothing hit the cache this time.

Usage this run13.5KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens13.5KAverage per run2.7K

Usage reportedReportedCache billingDid not happenResultNeeds attention

Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill

Long-context test

We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.

7 tiers

Verified up to 800K

1M Failed，原因：1M 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1MTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Current guidance

The 1M tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly12 / 12

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be18 / 18

No deductions

Does it answer like the official model25 / 25

No deductions

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10

No deductions

Will it keep working25 / 25

No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

24 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 298 tokens

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 46 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 59 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 130 tokens

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 180 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 120 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 62 tokens

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 4.6K tokens

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 100 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 120 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 455 tokens

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 170 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 134 tokens

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 284 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed, 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Cache-usage fields were not observable
This test used 13.5K tokens

32K 上下文能力实测

32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 32K
This test used 17.5K tokens

64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 64K
This test used 34.8K tokens

100K 上下文能力实测

100K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 100K
This test used 53.4K tokens
of which 49.2K tokens were billed at the cache price

200K 上下文能力实测

200K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 200K
This test used 106.8K tokens

400K 上下文能力实测

400K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 400K
This test used 213.5K tokens
of which 213.0K tokens were billed at the cache price

800K 上下文能力实测

800K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 800K
This test used 426.9K tokens
of which 426.0K tokens were billed at the cache price

1M 上下文能力实测

1M 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Failed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 failed.
Content length used: 1M

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is deepseek-v4-flash genuine? Deep check result

Report ID:MZZR20260715052433DB7E35Generated at：2026/07/15 13:24

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Highly matched

deepseek-v4-flash 本次深度验真结果：Highly matched（100/100）。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash

ProvidersConeverse AI

Requests30

Duration7 min

Identity verdictVerified

ReferenceMozhenzhen's own test standard

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Token cache usage test

Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.

Total 5 request

Share billed at the cache rate0.0%

No cache discount this time

The endpoint reported real usage but no cached part; this seller may not offer cache pricing, or nothing hit the cache this time.

Usage this run13.5KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens13.5KAverage per run2.7K

Usage reportedReportedCache billingDid not happenResultNeeds attention

Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill

Long-context test

We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.

7 tiers

Verified up to 800K

1M Failed，原因：1M 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Current guidance

The 1M tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly12 / 12

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be18 / 18

No deductions

Does it answer like the official model25 / 25

No deductions

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10

No deductions

Will it keep working25 / 25

No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

24 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 298 tokens

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 46 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 59 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 130 tokens

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 180 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 120 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 62 tokens

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 4.6K tokens

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 100 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 120 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 455 tokens

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 170 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 134 tokens

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 284 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed, 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Cache-usage fields were not observable
This test used 13.5K tokens

32K 上下文能力实测

32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 32K
This test used 17.5K tokens

64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 64K
This test used 34.8K tokens

100K 上下文能力实测

100K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 100K
This test used 53.4K tokens
of which 49.2K tokens were billed at the cache price

200K 上下文能力实测

200K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 200K
This test used 106.8K tokens

400K 上下文能力实测

400K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 400K
This test used 213.5K tokens
of which 213.0K tokens were billed at the cache price

800K 上下文能力实测

800K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 800K
This test used 426.9K tokens
of which 426.0K tokens were billed at the cache price

1M 上下文能力实测

1M 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Failed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 failed.
Content length used: 1M

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。