Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

gpt-5.4-codex deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR2026071505500447775AGenerated at 2026/07/15 13:50

Matched

gpt-5.4-codex 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched(86/100)。主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

86Consistency score

主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGPT-5.4 Codex
ProvidersInfistar
Samples34 probes
Duration6 min 10 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage37.1KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.8KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment50% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share37.8%
Low cache share

Cached tokens were observed, but the share is low. Review API parameters, context reuse, and billing methodology.

Observed tokens14.9KCached tokens5.6KNon-cached tokens9.3KAverage per run3.0K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 94.6%,缓存 Token 2.8K,观测 Token 3.0K94.6%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 94.6%,缓存 Token 2.8K,观测 Token 3.0K94.6%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
上游响应超时(标准题:JSON 结构) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
上游响应超时(标准题:JSON 结构) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

gpt-5.4-codex is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 24
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 24
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 421
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 322
Standard test: JSON structure

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:protocol。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: brand boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 14.9K
Cached tokens: 5.6K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 21.1K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

gpt-5.4-codex deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR2026071505500447775AGenerated at2026/07/15 13:50
Model consistency score

Matched

gpt-5.4-codex 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched(86/100)。主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGPT-5.4 Codex
ProvidersInfistar
Samples34
Duration6 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage37.1KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate74.8KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment50% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share37.8%
Low cache share

Cached tokens were observed, but the share is low. Review API parameters, context reuse, and billing methodology.

Observed tokens14.9KCached tokens5.6KNon-cached tokens9.3KAverage per run3.0K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 94.6%,缓存 Token 2.8K,观测 Token 3.0K94.6%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 3.0K0.0%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 94.6%,缓存 Token 2.8K,观测 Token 3.0K94.6%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
上游响应超时(标准题:JSON 结构) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
上游响应超时(标准题:JSON 结构) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

gpt-5.4-codex is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 24
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 24
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 421
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 322
Standard test: JSON structure

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:protocol。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: brand boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:OpenAI 身份与安全边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 14.9K
Cached tokens: 5.6K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 21.1K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video