Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

minimax-m3 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260722093516CBF738Generated at 2026/07/22 17:35

Matched

minimax-m3 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched(86/100)。主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

86Consistency score

主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelMiniMax-M3
Providersxinlicloud.top
Samples25 probes
Duration8 min 4 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage26.7KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.1KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment67% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 3 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens5.4KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens5.4KAverage per run1.8K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultHigh risk
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%2times3次:未返回用量数据未返回3times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

2 samples
Verified up to 32K

64K Failed,原因:64K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

64K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
上游响应超时(深度题:复测一致性) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
上游响应超时(深度题:复测一致性) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

19 checks
Model list visibility

minimax-m3 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 9
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 9
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 120
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 62
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 690
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 119
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 88
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 588
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 73
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 414
Cached tokens: 128
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Failed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Observed tokens: 72
品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
深度品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 检测过程中确认服务类故障,剩余样本和后续检测项已熔断跳过。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Failed
Samples: 3
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Observed tokens: 5.4K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.8K
Cached tokens: 128
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

minimax-m3 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260722093516CBF738Generated at2026/07/22 17:35
Model consistency score

Matched

minimax-m3 本次模型一致性深度验真结果:Matched(86/100)。主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelMiniMax-M3
Providersxinlicloud.top
Samples25
Duration8 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage26.7KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.1KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment67% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 3 times
Observed cache share0.0%
未观察到缓存字段

接口返回了实际 Token,但本次响应没有可识别的缓存 Token 字段;可能是渠道不返回、请求未命中或字段未被解析。

Observed tokens5.4KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens5.4KAverage per run1.8K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldNot observedResultHigh risk
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 0.0%,缓存 Token 0,观测 Token 2.7K0.0%2times3次:未返回用量数据未返回3times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

2 samples
Verified up to 32K

64K Failed,原因:64K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

64K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项:上游响应超时;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
上游响应超时(深度题:复测一致性) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
上游响应超时(深度题:复测一致性) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

19 checks
Model list visibility

minimax-m3 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 9
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 9
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 120
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 62
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 690
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 119
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 88
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 588
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 73
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 414
Cached tokens: 128
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Failed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Observed tokens: 72
品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
深度品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:MiniMax 中文能力边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认上游响应超时,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 检测过程中确认服务类故障,剩余样本和后续检测项已熔断跳过。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Failed
Samples: 3
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Observed tokens: 5.4K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 18.8K
Cached tokens: 128
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video