Free model verification · Redacted public report

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202608040712346D096DGenerated at 2026/08/04 15:12

Highly matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

100Consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.2

Providersconeverse.com

Samples135 probes

Duration7 min 58 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage969.6KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate90.1KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment977% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times

Observed cache share92.1%

缓存字段表现稳定

多次测试均返回缓存 Token，说明这条链路的长对话用量记录有参考价值。

Observed tokens14.2KCached tokens13.1KNon-cached tokens1.1KAverage per run2.8K

Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal

Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

7 samples

Verified up to 800K

1M 需要关注，原因：上下文保持较弱。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1MTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Current guidance

1M 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure12 / 12

No deductions

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability25 / 25

No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

27 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 104
API path: /models
Visible models: 104

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 436

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 173

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 274

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 318

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 273

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 431

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 167

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.3K
Cached tokens: 192

Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 385

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 502

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.7K

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 277

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 124

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 650

Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 14.2K
Cached tokens: 13.1K

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.8K
Cached tokens: 19.2K

专项：64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 38.7K
Cached tokens: 38.5K

专项：100K 上下文能力实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：100K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 59.4K
Cached tokens: 59.1K

专项：200K 上下文能力实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：200K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 118.7K

专项：400K 上下文能力实测

400K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：400K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 400K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 237.0K

专项：800K 上下文能力实测

800K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：800K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 800K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 473.9K

专项：1M 上下文能力实测

1M 长度样本未形成稳定结果，本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 专项：1M 上下文能力实测
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 1M
Needs review原因：上下文保持较弱
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

专项：流式 / 非流式一致性

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：流式 / 非流式一致性
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Specialty: 流式、工具与结构化输出检测
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 152

专项：工具调用结构

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：工具调用结构
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Specialty: 流式、工具与结构化输出检测
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 236

专项：JSON Schema 结构化输出

执行专项题，用于形成模真真验真证据。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 专项：JSON Schema 结构化输出
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Specialty: 流式、工具与结构化输出检测
Needs review原因：结构化输出不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202608040712346D096DGenerated at：2026/08/04 15:12

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Highly matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Highly matched (100/100). All primary checks passed in this run.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.2

Providersconeverse.com

Samples135

Duration8 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times

Observed cache share92.1%

缓存字段表现稳定

多次测试均返回缓存 Token，说明这条链路的长对话用量记录有参考价值。

Observed tokens14.2KCached tokens13.1KNon-cached tokens1.1KAverage per run2.8K

Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal

Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

7 samples

Verified up to 800K

1M 需要关注，原因：上下文保持较弱。

Current guidance

1M 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure12 / 12

No deductions

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability25 / 25

No deductions

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

27 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 104
API path: /models
Visible models: 104

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 436

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 173

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 274

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 318

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 273

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 431

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 167

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.3K
Cached tokens: 192

Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 385

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 502

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.7K

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 277

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 124

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 650

Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 14.2K
Cached tokens: 13.1K

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.8K
Cached tokens: 19.2K

专项：64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 38.7K
Cached tokens: 38.5K

专项：100K 上下文能力实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：100K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 59.4K
Cached tokens: 59.1K

专项：200K 上下文能力实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：200K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 118.7K

专项：400K 上下文能力实测

400K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：400K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 400K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 237.0K

专项：800K 上下文能力实测

800K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：800K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 800K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 473.9K

专项：1M 上下文能力实测

1M 长度样本未形成稳定结果，本次按边界样本记录。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 专项：1M 上下文能力实测
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 1M
Needs review原因：上下文保持较弱
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

专项：流式 / 非流式一致性

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：流式 / 非流式一致性
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Specialty: 流式、工具与结构化输出检测
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 152

专项：工具调用结构

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 专项：工具调用结构
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Specialty: 流式、工具与结构化输出检测
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 236

专项：JSON Schema 结构化输出

执行专项题，用于形成模真真验真证据。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: 专项：JSON Schema 结构化输出
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Specialty: 流式、工具与结构化输出检测
Needs review原因：结构化输出不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments