Is glm-5.1 genuine? Deep check result

Report ID MZZR202608050732472155ECGenerated at 2026/08/05 15:32

Highly matched

glm-5.1 本次深度验真结果：Highly matched（100/100）。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。

100Model consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.1

Providers聚光AI

Requests137

Duration3 min 46 sec

Identity verdictVerified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage140.5KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage322.5KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation56% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Token cache usage test

Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.

Total 5 request

Share billed at the cache rate55.2%

Low cache share

Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.

Usage this run14.3KCached tokens7.9KNon-cached tokens6.4KAverage per run2.9K

Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultNormal

Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill

Long-context test

We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.

4 tiers

Verified up to 100K

200K Failed，原因：接口鉴权或权限异常。

Reference windowReference window 200KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Current guidance

The 200K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly12 / 12

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be18 / 18

No deductions

Does it answer like the official model25 / 25

No deductions

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10

No deductions

Will it keep working25 / 25

No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

24 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.1 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 109 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 246 tokens

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 160 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 220 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 320 tokens

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 218 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 409 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 171 tokens

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 2.0K tokens

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 289 tokens

GLM 系列边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 405 tokens

GLM 系列边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 1.6K tokens

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 309 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 133 tokens

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 886 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 14.3K tokens
of which 7.9K tokens were billed at the cache price

32K 上下文能力实测

32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 32K
This test used 19.4K tokens

64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 64K
This test used 38.8K tokens

100K 上下文能力实测

100K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 100K
This test used 59.6K tokens

200K 上下文能力实测

200K 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Failed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 failed.
Why it failed: API authentication or permission error
Content length used: 200K

边打字边回和一次性回，结果一样吗

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 166 tokens

让它调用工具，返回格式对不对

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 263 tokens

让它按指定格式输出，格式兑现了吗

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is glm-5.1 genuine? Deep check result

Report ID:MZZR202608050732472155ECGenerated at：2026/08/05 15:32

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Highly matched

glm-5.1 本次深度验真结果：Highly matched（100/100）。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.1

Providers聚光AI

Requests137

Duration4 min

Identity verdictVerified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Token cache usage test

Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.

Total 5 request

Share billed at the cache rate55.2%

Low cache share

Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.

Usage this run14.3KCached tokens7.9KNon-cached tokens6.4KAverage per run2.9K

Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultNormal

Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill

Long-context test

We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.

4 tiers

Verified up to 100K

200K Failed，原因：接口鉴权或权限异常。

Current guidance

The 200K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly12 / 12

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be18 / 18

No deductions

Does it answer like the official model25 / 25

No deductions

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10

No deductions

Will it keep working25 / 25

No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

24 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.1 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 109 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 246 tokens

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 160 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 220 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 320 tokens

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 218 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 409 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 171 tokens

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 2.0K tokens

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 289 tokens

GLM 系列边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 405 tokens

GLM 系列边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 1.6K tokens

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 309 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 133 tokens

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 886 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 14.3K tokens
of which 7.9K tokens were billed at the cache price

32K 上下文能力实测

32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 32K
This test used 19.4K tokens

64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 64K
This test used 38.8K tokens

100K 上下文能力实测

100K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 100K
This test used 59.6K tokens

200K 上下文能力实测

200K 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Failed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 failed.
Why it failed: API authentication or permission error
Content length used: 200K

边打字边回和一次性回，结果一样吗

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 166 tokens

让它调用工具，返回格式对不对

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 263 tokens

让它按指定格式输出，格式兑现了吗

针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。