Is gpt-5.6-luna genuine? Deep check result
Highly matched
gpt-5.6-luna 本次深度验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
All primary checks passed in this run.
gpt-5.6-luna 本次深度验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
All primary checks passed in this run.
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
800K 需要关注,原因:上下文保持较弱。
The 800K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
All primary checks passed in this run.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
gpt-5.6-luna is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 6 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.6K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 26 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.4K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 92 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 366 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 80 tokens
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 336 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 569 tokens
反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 383 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 130 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 360 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 132 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 398 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 481 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.4K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 324 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 424 tokens
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 14.6K tokens of which 8.4K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 21.1K tokens
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 41.5K tokens
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 68.2K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 132.1K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 255.7K tokens
800K 长度的内容没能稳定读完,这次就记到这里为止。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Context retention was weak Content length used: 800K
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhengpt-5.6-luna 本次深度验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
800K 需要关注,原因:上下文保持较弱。
The 800K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
All primary checks passed in this run.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
gpt-5.6-luna is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 6 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.6K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 26 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.4K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 92 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 366 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 80 tokens
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 336 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 569 tokens
反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 383 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 130 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 360 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 132 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 398 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 481 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.4K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 324 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 424 tokens
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 14.6K tokens of which 8.4K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 21.1K tokens
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 41.5K tokens
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 68.2K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 132.1K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 255.7K tokens
800K 长度的内容没能稳定读完,这次就记到这里为止。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Context retention was weak Content length used: 800K
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
发表评论