Is claude-opus-4-5 genuine? Standard check result

Report ID MZZR20260809185519C4A892Generated at 2026/08/10 02:55

Highly matched

claude-opus-4-5 本次标准验真结果：Highly matched（100/100）。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。

100Model consistency score

All primary checks passed in this run.

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Opus 4.5 (latest)

Providerstoter.me

Requests18

Duration28 sec

Identity verdictVerified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage25.2KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage250.7KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation90% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Long-context test

We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.

2 tiers

Verified up to 32K

64K Failed，原因：额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 200KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Current guidance

The 64K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly15 / 15

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be20 / 20

No deductions

Does it answer like the official model20 / 20

No deductions

Is usage and billing reasonable15 / 15

No deductions

Will it keep working15 / 15

No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

14 checks

Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 415 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 359 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 517 tokens
of which 384 tokens were billed at the cache price

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 444 tokens

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 421 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 444 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 404 tokens

Claude 隐藏思考边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 426 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 277 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 561 tokens
of which 384 tokens were billed at the cache price

32K 上下文能力实测

32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 32K
This test used 20.4K tokens

64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Failed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 failed.
Why it failed: Quota or rate limit reached
Content length used: 64K

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is claude-opus-4-5 genuine? Standard check result

Report ID:MZZR20260809185519C4A892Generated at：2026/08/10 02:55

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Highly matched

claude-opus-4-5 本次标准验真结果：Highly matched（100/100）。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Opus 4.5 (latest)

Providerstoter.me

Requests18

Duration28 sec

Identity verdictVerified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Long-context test

We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.

2 tiers

Verified up to 32K

64K Failed，原因：额度或频率限制。

Current guidance

The 64K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Highly matched100/100

All primary checks passed in this run.

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly15 / 15

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be20 / 20

No deductions

Does it answer like the official model20 / 20

No deductions

Is usage and billing reasonable15 / 15

No deductions

Will it keep working15 / 15

No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

14 checks

Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 415 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 359 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 517 tokens
of which 384 tokens were billed at the cache price

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 444 tokens

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 421 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 444 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 404 tokens

Claude 隐藏思考边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 426 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 277 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 561 tokens
of which 384 tokens were billed at the cache price

32K 上下文能力实测

32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
Content length used: 32K
This test used 20.4K tokens

64K 上下文能力实测

64K 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。

Failed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 failed.
Why it failed: Quota or rate limit reached
Content length used: 64K

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。