Verification report details

Is minimax-m3 genuine? Deep check result

Report ID MZZR20260812024030EA52EEGenerated at 2026/08/12 10:40

Matched with issues

minimax-m3 本次深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(79/100)。主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;分不清自己属于哪一代模型。

79Model consistency score

主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;分不清自己属于哪一代模型。

Tested byMozhenzhen
Tested modelMiniMax-M3
Providersnextapi.store
Requests24
Duration1 min 24 sec
Identity verdictVerified
Reference模真真既有版本化基线
A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage6.5KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage6.8KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation5% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues79/100

主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;分不清自己属于哪一代模型。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10
No deductions
Does the API respond properly12 / 12
No deductions
Is it the model it claims to be11 / 18
分不清自己属于哪一代模型(模型族题:系列和档位识别) -7
Does it answer like the official model15 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -10
Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10
No deductions
Will it keep working21 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

16 checks
Model list visibility

minimax-m3 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 309 tokens
of which 219 tokens were billed at the cache price
指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 230 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 239 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 266 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 503 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 365 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 262 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
复测一致性

反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 523 tokens
of which 323 tokens were billed at the cache price
MiniMax 中文能力边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 411 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
MiniMax 中文能力边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 1.2K tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 313 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型,看答案对不对。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable
This test used 823 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 729 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论,来写第一条。

发表评论

MozhenzhenBefore you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is minimax-m3 genuine? Deep check result

Report ID:MZZR20260812024030EA52EEGenerated at:2026/08/12 10:40
Provider detailsAI model details
A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。
Model consistency score

Matched with issues

minimax-m3 本次深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(79/100)。主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;分不清自己属于哪一代模型。

Tested byMozhenzhen
Tested modelMiniMax-M3
Providersnextapi.store
Requests24
Duration1 min
Identity verdictVerified
Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage6.5KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage6.8KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation5% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues79/100

主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;分不清自己属于哪一代模型。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10
No deductions
Does the API respond properly12 / 12
No deductions
Is it the model it claims to be11 / 18
分不清自己属于哪一代模型(模型族题:系列和档位识别) -7
Does it answer like the official model15 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -10
Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10
No deductions
Will it keep working21 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

16 checks
Model list visibility

minimax-m3 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 309 tokens
of which 219 tokens were billed at the cache price
指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 230 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 239 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 266 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 503 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 365 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 262 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
复测一致性

反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 523 tokens
of which 323 tokens were billed at the cache price
MiniMax 中文能力边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 411 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
MiniMax 中文能力边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 1.2K tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 313 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型,看答案对不对。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable
This test used 823 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 729 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论,来写第一条。

发表评论