Is deepseek-v4-flash genuine? Deep check result

Report ID MZZR202608120243355B484AGenerated at 2026/08/12 10:43

Matched with issues

deepseek-v4-flash 本次深度验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（83/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；它自称的型号前后对不上。

83Model consistency score

主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；它自称的型号前后对不上。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash

Providersnextapi.store

Requests29

Duration1 min 1 sec

Identity verdictVerified

ReferenceOken

A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage16.8KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage57.7KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation71% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues83/100

主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；它自称的型号前后对不上。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly12 / 12

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be15 / 18

它自称的型号前后对不上（模型身份自报） -3

Does it answer like the official model15 / 25

复杂推理题答得不稳（逻辑网格推理） -10

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10

No deductions

Will it keep working21 / 25

复杂推理题答得不稳（逻辑网格推理） -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

17 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 115 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 152 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 184 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 154 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 193 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 153 tokens

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 246 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 180 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

DeepSeek 推理边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 523 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 203 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 206 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 284 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 13.9K tokens
of which 13.4K tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is deepseek-v4-flash genuine? Deep check result

Report ID:MZZR202608120243355B484AGenerated at：2026/08/12 10:43

Provider details AI model details

A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。

Model consistency score

Matched with issues

deepseek-v4-flash 本次深度验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（83/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；它自称的型号前后对不上。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash

Providersnextapi.store

Requests29

Duration1 min

Identity verdictVerified

ReferenceOken

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues83/100

主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；它自称的型号前后对不上。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly12 / 12

No deductions

Is it the model it claims to be15 / 18

它自称的型号前后对不上（模型身份自报） -3

Does it answer like the official model15 / 25

复杂推理题答得不稳（逻辑网格推理） -10

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10

No deductions

Will it keep working21 / 25

复杂推理题答得不稳（逻辑网格推理） -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

17 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 115 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 152 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 184 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 154 tokens

品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 193 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 153 tokens

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 246 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 180 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

DeepSeek 推理边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 523 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 203 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 206 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 284 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 13.9K tokens
of which 13.4K tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。