Free model verification · Redacted public report

minimax-m3 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260812024617033867Generated at 2026/08/12 10:46

High risk

minimax-m3 deep verification result: High risk (55/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Upstream response timed out; Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear.

55Consistency score

主要扣分项：逻辑网格推理不稳定；上游响应超时；隐藏提示词边界不清。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelMiniMax-M3

Providersnextapi.store

Samples24 probes

Duration3 min 21 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictNot verified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage23.6KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate27.4KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment14% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples

Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

High risk55/100

主要扣分项：逻辑网格推理不稳定；上游响应超时；隐藏提示词边界不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

上游响应超时（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests9 / 25

逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -10隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -6

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability0 / 25

复测一致性不足（深度题：复测一致性） -9逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -4隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -3上游响应超时（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -8存在Failed证据项 -1

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

17 checks

Model list visibility

minimax-m3 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 284
Cached tokens: 219

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 238
Cached tokens: 114

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 226
Cached tokens: 193

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 268
Cached tokens: 217

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 466
Cached tokens: 207

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 310
Cached tokens: 114

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 245
Cached tokens: 198

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: retest consistency

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：stability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：复测一致性不足
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.0K
Cached tokens: 390

品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 890
Cached tokens: 220

深度品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.2K
Cached tokens: 220

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 554
Cached tokens: 231

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 17.6K
Cached tokens: 128

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

minimax-m3 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260812024617033867Generated at：2026/08/12 10:46

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

High risk

minimax-m3 deep verification result: High risk (55/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Upstream response timed out; Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelMiniMax-M3

Providersnextapi.store

Samples24

Duration3 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictNot verified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples

Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

High risk55/100

主要扣分项：逻辑网格推理不稳定；上游响应超时；隐藏提示词边界不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

上游响应超时（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests9 / 25

逻辑网格推理不稳定（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -10隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -6

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability0 / 25

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

17 checks

Model list visibility

minimax-m3 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 284
Cached tokens: 219

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 238
Cached tokens: 114

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 226
Cached tokens: 193

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 268
Cached tokens: 217

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 466
Cached tokens: 207

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 310
Cached tokens: 114

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 245
Cached tokens: 198

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Deep test: retest consistency

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：stability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Needs review
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：复测一致性不足
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.0K
Cached tokens: 390

品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 890
Cached tokens: 220

深度品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：MiniMax 中文能力边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.2K
Cached tokens: 220

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 554
Cached tokens: 231

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 17.6K
Cached tokens: 128

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments