deepseek-v4-flash 本次深度验真结果：Matched（86/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳。
主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
32K 需要关注，原因：上下文保持较弱。
The 32K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 546 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 114 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 153 tokens
按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 210 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 136 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 186 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 124 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 256 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 202 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 535 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 200 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 179 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 405 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 13.9K tokens of which 13.4K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Context retention was weak Content length used: 32K
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhendeepseek-v4-flash 本次深度验真结果：Matched（86/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
32K 需要关注，原因：上下文保持较弱。
The 32K tier did not return reliably this time; do not rely on this length.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 546 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 114 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 153 tokens
按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 210 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 136 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 186 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 124 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 256 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 202 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 535 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 200 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 179 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 405 tokens of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 13.9K tokens of which 13.4K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容没能稳定读完，这次就记到这里为止。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Context retention was weak Content length used: 32K
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论