Is claude-opus-4-6 genuine? Standard check result

Report ID MZZR2026081401062858DE9CGenerated at 2026/08/14 09:06

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

claude-opus-4-6 本次标准验真结果：疑似假冒 / 不可用（35/100）。主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

35Model consistency score

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Opus 4.6

ProvidersFreeModel — One API for every frontier model

Requests19

Duration3 sec

Identity verdictNot verified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Estimated usage855The API did not report actual usage; the estimate is shown.DeviationNoneThe API did not report actual usage; only the estimate is shown.Usage checkEstimate onlyFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable35/100

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly2 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -4它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -3

Is it the model it claims to be0 / 20

会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂（品牌边界） -4问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -10分不清自己属于哪一代模型（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -6

Does it answer like the official model0 / 20

不太听指令，让它怎么答它不照做（指令跟随） -8问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -6让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -3

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 15

它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -5

Will it keep working8 / 15

问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -3有几个关键检测项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

12 checks

Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-6 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Instruction following was unstable

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable

Claude 隐藏思考边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable

Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is claude-opus-4-6 genuine? Standard check result

Report ID:MZZR2026081401062858DE9CGenerated at：2026/08/14 09:06

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Opus 4.6

ProvidersFreeModel — One API for every frontier model

Requests19

Duration3 sec

Identity verdictNot verified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable35/100

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly2 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -4它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -3

Is it the model it claims to be0 / 20

Does it answer like the official model0 / 20

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 15

它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -5

Will it keep working8 / 15

问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -3有几个关键检测项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

12 checks

Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-6 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 8 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Instruction following was unstable

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable

Claude 隐藏思考边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable

Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。