Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260815043830B61835Generated at 2026/08/15 12:38

Matched

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification result: Matched (86/100). Main deductions: Quota or rate limit reached; Failed evidence items were found.

86Consistency score

主要扣分项:额度或频率限制;存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash
Providerssensenova.cn
Samples12 probes
Duration11 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisOken

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage565From the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment100% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K Failed,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项:额度或频率限制;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility6 / 10
额度或频率限制(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -4
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
额度或频率限制(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
API path: /models
Visible models: 5
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 292
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 49
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 60
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 102
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Standard test: brand boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
正式来源必检:专项:Token缓存消耗 5 轮

按Oken确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:Token缓存消耗 5 轮
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260815043830B61835Generated at2026/08/15 12:38
Model consistency score

Matched

deepseek-v4-flash deep verification result: Matched (86/100). Main deductions: Quota or rate limit reached; Failed evidence items were found.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash
Providerssensenova.cn
Samples12
Duration11 sec
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisOken

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage565From the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate1.7MPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment100% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples
边界在 32K

32K Failed,原因:额度或频率限制。

Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
Current guidance

32K 档暂不作为当前线路的稳定上下文参考。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项:额度或频率限制;存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility6 / 10
额度或频率限制(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -4
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability15 / 25
额度或频率限制(标准题:隐藏提示词边界) -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

18 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
API path: /models
Visible models: 5
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 292
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 49
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 60
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 102
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1
Standard test: brand boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Standard test: usage observability

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:usage。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep test: retest consistency

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:stability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界

执行 品牌题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:DeepSeek 推理证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:identity。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
正式来源必检:专项:Token缓存消耗 5 轮

按Oken确定的方法执行。执行 专项题,用于形成模真真验真证据。 前序检测已确认额度或频率限制,为避免继续制造无效请求,本项已跳过。

Skipped
Test evidence
Check: 正式来源必检:专项:Token缓存消耗 5 轮
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
跳过原因:service_failure_circuit_breaker
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K 长度样本未形成稳定结果,本次按边界样本记录。

Failed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Needs review原因:额度或频率限制
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video