grok-4.5 本次标准验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（81/100）。主要问题：接口返回的格式不规范；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
主要问题：接口返回的格式不规范；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：接口返回的格式不规范；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
grok-4.5 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 3 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 2.0K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 392 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 829 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 660 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear This test used 1.9K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 2.5K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 554 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.2K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.3K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.1K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 433 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Protocol structure was unstable
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.0K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 18.6K tokens of which 11.5K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 19.7K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhengrok-4.5 本次标准验真结果：Matched但Matched with issues（81/100）。主要问题：接口返回的格式不规范；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
主要问题：接口返回的格式不规范；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸。
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
grok-4.5 is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 3 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 2.0K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 392 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 829 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 660 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear This test used 1.9K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 2.5K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 554 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.2K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.3K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.1K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 433 tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 有几次没对上。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Protocol structure was unstable
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 1.0K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 18.6K tokens of which 11.5K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完，这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 19.7K tokens of which 192 tokens were billed at the cache price
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论