Is claude-fable-5 genuine? Deep check result

Report ID MZZR202608260828328E6B43Generated at 2026/08/26 16:28

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

claude-fable-5 本次深度验真结果：疑似假冒 / 不可用（20/100）。主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；同一个问题反复问，答案会变。

20Model consistency score

主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；同一个问题反复问，答案会变。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Fable 5

Providersxf

Requests23

Duration1 min 4 sec

Identity verdictNot verified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage318The actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage1.8KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation82% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable20/100

主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；同一个问题反复问，答案会变。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly0 / 12

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -4它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -2

Is it the model it claims to be0 / 18

会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂（品牌边界、Claude 隐藏思考边界） -4问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -10分不清自己属于哪一代模型（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -4

Does it answer like the official model0 / 25

不太听指令，让它怎么答它不照做（指令跟随） -8复杂推理题答得不稳（逻辑网格推理） -10问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3这个型号该有的特点答不上来（深度模型题：模型族专属边界） -3问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -1

Is usage and billing reasonable5 / 10

它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -5

Will it keep working5 / 25

同一个问题反复问，答案会变（复测一致性） -9复杂推理题答得不稳（逻辑网格推理） -4问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -3有几个关键检测项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

16 checks

Model list visibility

claude-fable-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 7 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 242 tokens

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Instruction following was unstable

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 need attention.
Why it failed: Retest consistency was insufficient

Claude 隐藏思考边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

Claude 隐藏思考边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable

Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-specific boundary response was unclear

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is claude-fable-5 genuine? Deep check result

Report ID:MZZR202608260828328E6B43Generated at：2026/08/26 16:28

Provider details AI model details

A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。

Model consistency score

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Fable 5

Providersxf

Requests23

Duration1 min

Identity verdictNot verified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable20/100

主要问题：复杂推理题答得不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；同一个问题反复问，答案会变。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10

No deductions

Does the API respond properly0 / 12

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -4它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -2

Is it the model it claims to be0 / 18

Does it answer like the official model0 / 25

Is usage and billing reasonable5 / 10

它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -5

Will it keep working5 / 25

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

16 checks

Model list visibility

claude-fable-5 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 7 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 242 tokens

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Instruction following was unstable

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable

逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable

复测一致性

反复多问几次，看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 2 times: 2 need attention.
Why it failed: Retest consistency was insufficient

Claude 隐藏思考边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

Claude 隐藏思考边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable

Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-specific boundary response was unclear

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。