Is deepseek-v4-flash genuine? Standard check result

Report ID MZZR202608301147389B05EEGenerated at 2026/08/30 19:47

High risk

deepseek-v4-flash 本次标准验真结果：High risk（59/100）。主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错；它不报回用量，没法核对扣费。

59Model consistency score

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错；它不报回用量，没法核对扣费。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash

ProvidersAPI 节点 8BDEC125

Requests23

Duration5 min 56 sec

Identity verdictNot verified

ReferenceOken

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage16.9KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage56.2KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation70% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

High risk59/100

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错；它不报回用量，没法核对扣费。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly6 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -3

Is it the model it claims to be0 / 20

会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂（品牌边界、DeepSeek 推理边界） -4它自称的型号前后对不上（模型身份自报） -3问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -10分不清自己属于哪一代模型（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -3

Does it answer like the official model14 / 20

问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -3

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 15

它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -5

Will it keep working14 / 15

有几个关键检测项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

13 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 7 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 129 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 151 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 384 tokens

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear
This test used 569 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable
This test used 547 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 394 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable
This test used 547 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 14.0K tokens
of which 10.5K tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is deepseek-v4-flash genuine? Standard check result

Report ID:MZZR202608301147389B05EEGenerated at：2026/08/30 19:47

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

High risk

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash

ProvidersAPI 节点 8BDEC125

Requests23

Duration6 min

Identity verdictNot verified

ReferenceOken

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

High risk59/100

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错；它不报回用量，没法核对扣费。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly6 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -3

Is it the model it claims to be0 / 20

Does it answer like the official model14 / 20

问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -3

Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 15

它不报回用量，没法核对扣费（用量数据是否完整） -5

Will it keep working14 / 15

有几个关键检测项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

13 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 7 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 129 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 151 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 384 tokens

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear
This test used 569 tokens

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable
This test used 547 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 394 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-family identification was unstable
This test used 547 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 14.0K tokens
of which 10.5K tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。