Is deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp genuine? Standard check result

Report ID MZZR20260830115907525C52Generated at 2026/08/30 19:59

Doubtful

deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp 本次标准验真结果：Doubtful（61/100）。主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

61Model consistency score

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

ProvidersAPI 节点 8BDEC125

Requests23

Duration5 min 14 sec

Identity verdictNot verified

ReferenceOken

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage16.2KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage56.3KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation71% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful61/100

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly9 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6

Is it the model it claims to be3 / 20

会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂（品牌边界） -4它自称的型号前后对不上（模型身份自报） -3问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -10

Does it answer like the official model8 / 20

问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -6让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -3

Is usage and billing reasonable15 / 15

No deductions

Will it keep working11 / 15

问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -3有几个关键检测项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

13 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 7 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 133 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 116 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear
This test used 400 tokens

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 403 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 448 tokens

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 400 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 180 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 13.9K tokens
of which 13.1K tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp genuine? Standard check result

Report ID:MZZR20260830115907525C52Generated at：2026/08/30 19:59

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Doubtful

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

ProvidersAPI 节点 8BDEC125

Requests23

Duration5 min

Identity verdictNot verified

ReferenceOken

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful61/100

主要问题：问它是哪个型号时答案会变；问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly9 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6

Is it the model it claims to be3 / 20

会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂（品牌边界） -4它自称的型号前后对不上（模型身份自报） -3问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -10

Does it answer like the official model8 / 20

Is usage and billing reasonable15 / 15

No deductions

Will it keep working11 / 15

问到不该说的内容时把握不住分寸（隐藏提示词边界） -3有几个关键检测项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

13 checks

Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 7 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 133 tokens

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 116 tokens

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear
This test used 400 tokens

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 403 tokens

DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 448 tokens

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 400 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 180 tokens

连问 5 次，重复内容有没有按缓存价计费

对照官方公开的产品说明来测。针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 5 times: 5 passed.
This test used 13.9K tokens
of which 13.1K tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。