Is gpt-5.6-sol genuine? Deep check result
Insufficient evidence to determine
Insufficient evidence to determine model identity. API, speed, tool, and token observations are recorded separately and do not establish identity.
主要问题:接口返回的格式不规范。
Insufficient evidence to determine model identity. API, speed, tool, and token observations are recorded separately and do not establish identity.
主要问题:接口返回的格式不规范。
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
API results and model identity are assessed separately. Insufficient evidence does not mean a failed request or a fake model.
No reference samples under matching conditions are available for this model.
Model self-identification and individual answers do not establish authenticity. Official references only reflect API behavior at the time of sampling.
Rule version:2026-09-14.v1Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
gpt-5.6-sol is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 2 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 396 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 151 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 332 tokens
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 204 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 234 tokens
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 163 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.7K tokens of which 3.6K tokens were billed at the cache price
反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 8.8K tokens of which 7.7K tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 218 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 504 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 211 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.6K tokens of which 3.6K tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次里对了 0 次。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Protocol structure was unstable
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 152 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 165 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 22.6K tokens of which 13.9K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 25.1K tokens of which 3.5K tokens were billed at the cache price
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenInsufficient evidence to determine model identity. API, speed, tool, and token observations are recorded separately and do not establish identity.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
API results and model identity are assessed separately. Insufficient evidence does not mean a failed request or a fake model.
No reference samples under matching conditions are available for this model.
Model self-identification and individual answers do not establish authenticity. Official references only reflect API behavior at the time of sampling.
Rule version:2026-09-14.v1Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
gpt-5.6-sol is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 2 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 396 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 151 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 332 tokens
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 204 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 234 tokens
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 163 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.7K tokens of which 3.6K tokens were billed at the cache price
反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed. This test used 8.8K tokens of which 7.7K tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 218 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 504 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens of which 3.8K tokens were billed at the cache price
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 211 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.6K tokens of which 3.6K tokens were billed at the cache price
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次里对了 0 次。
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention. Why it failed: Protocol structure was unstable
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 152 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 165 tokens
对照官方公开的产品说明来测。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 4.5K tokens
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 22.6K tokens of which 13.9K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 25.1K tokens of which 3.5K tokens were billed at the cache price