A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。
UndeterminedBelow decision threshold
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近，本次无法判定。
Brand consistency90/100
Model match score (qwen3.8-flash)89/100
Checks12/17 Passed
- Providers
- opencode
- Claimed model
- qwen3.8-flash
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 102 official models
- Requests
- 22
- Duration
- 13 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CInvalidIndependent sample D采样 DValidIndependent sample E采样 EValidIndependent sample F采样 FValidIndependent sample G采样 GValidIndependent sample H采样 HValidIndependent sample I采样 IValidReference102 official models · 7/9 Valid
Answer by answer7 answers: 3 match qwen3.8-flash；another 4 match no model clearly on their own
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
These answers are not close to any official model on file. The percentages below only rank them against each other and do not mean the answers resemble any of these models.
- qwen3.8-flashClaimed model89%
- kimi-k32%
- gpt-5.4-mini2%
- gpt-52%
- gpt-6-luna1%
02Test details
17 items · 12 passed · 5 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes qwen3.8-flash |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 7 / 9 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加两轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 90; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 89; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Cannot be identified | Not close to any official model on file, so the substitute's vendor cannot be told |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Cache billing works | On average 93% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price. |
| D-02 | Context length | 32K passed | Read in full up to 32K; 128K failed: The endpoint returned no result. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Supported | Returned in the required JSON structure |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio92.5%
Cache billing works
On average 93% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price.
Usage this run29.4KCached tokens21.5KNon-cached tokens7.9KAverage per run5.9K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultCache billing works
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 32K
这条线能稳定读完 32K 的内容；到 128K 就读不稳了，建议按 32K 来用。
Reference windowVerified up to 32KThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 31.8K received
- 128KThe endpoint returned no result
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage141.8KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage1.3M-1.8MEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation89% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
qwen3.8-flash verification report
A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。
UndeterminedBelow decision threshold
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近，本次无法判定。
Brand consistency90/100
Model match score (qwen3.8-flash)89/100
Checks12/17 Passed
- Providers
- opencode
- Claimed model
- qwen3.8-flash
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 102 official models
- Requests
- 22
- Duration
- 13 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CInvalidIndependent sample D采样 DValidIndependent sample E采样 EValidIndependent sample F采样 FValidIndependent sample G采样 GValidIndependent sample H采样 HValidIndependent sample I采样 IValidReference102 official models · 7/9 Valid
Answer by answer7 answers: 3 match qwen3.8-flash；another 4 match no model clearly on their own
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
These answers are not close to any official model on file. The percentages below only rank them against each other and do not mean the answers resemble any of these models.
- qwen3.8-flashClaimed model89%
- kimi-k32%
- gpt-5.4-mini2%
- gpt-52%
- gpt-6-luna1%
02Test details
17 items · 12 passed · 5 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes qwen3.8-flash |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 7 / 9 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加两轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 90; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 89; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Cannot be identified | Not close to any official model on file, so the substitute's vendor cannot be told |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Cache billing works | On average 93% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price. |
| D-02 | Context length | 32K passed | Read in full up to 32K; 128K failed: The endpoint returned no result. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Supported | Returned in the required JSON structure |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio92.5%
Cache billing works
On average 93% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price.
Usage this run29.4KCached tokens21.5KNon-cached tokens7.9KAverage per run5.9K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultCache billing works
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 32K
这条线能稳定读完 32K 的内容；到 128K 就读不稳了，建议按 32K 来用。
Reference windowVerified up to 32KThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 31.8K received
- 128KThe endpoint returned no result
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage141.8KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage1.3M-1.8MEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation89% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论
编辑器加载中…
发表评论