A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。
Identity confirmedModel verified
Confirmed as the official claude-opus-5-5
Behavior matches the official claude-opus-5-5.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (claude-opus-5-5)100/100
Checks13/17 Passed
- Providers
- 790053500.com
- Claimed model
- claude-opus-5-5
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 103 official models
- Requests
- 16
- Duration
- 55 秒
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference103 official models · 2/3 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 2 match claude-opus-5-5
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- claude-opus-5-5Claimed model>99%
- mimo-v2.6-flash<1%
- claude-fable-5-1<1%
- claude-opus-5<1%
- kimi-k3<1%
02Test details
17 items · 13 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-opus-5-5 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 3 valid | Some samples could not be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the Anthropic Claude family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Match | 与官方 claude-opus-5-5 吻合，型号一致度 100 |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Does not work | The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it. |
| D-02 | Context length | 32K passed | Read in full up to 32K; 128K failed: 未能提取文档开头、中段、末尾的关键信息. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Did not follow the schema | The response did not follow the required JSON schema |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio0.0%
Does not work
The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it.
Usage this run48.7KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens48.7KAverage per run9.7K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingDid not happenResultDoes not work
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 32K
Read in full up to 32K; 128K failed: 未能提取文档开头、中段、末尾的关键信息.
Reference windowVerified up to 32KThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 44.6K received
- 128K未能提取文档开头、中段、末尾的关键信息
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage218.3KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage157.4K-302.3KEstimated from this test's requests.DeviationWithin the estimateThe reported usage is within the estimated range.Usage checkMatches the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Post an anonymous comment
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
claude-opus-5-5 verification report
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。
Identity confirmedModel verified
Confirmed as the official claude-opus-5-5
Behavior matches the official claude-opus-5-5.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (claude-opus-5-5)100/100
Checks13/17 Passed
- Providers
- 790053500.com
- Claimed model
- claude-opus-5-5
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 103 official models
- Requests
- 16
- Duration
- 55 秒
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference103 official models · 2/3 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 2 match claude-opus-5-5
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- claude-opus-5-5Claimed model>99%
- mimo-v2.6-flash<1%
- claude-fable-5-1<1%
- claude-opus-5<1%
- kimi-k3<1%
02Test details
17 items · 13 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-opus-5-5 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 3 valid | Some samples could not be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the Anthropic Claude family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Match | 与官方 claude-opus-5-5 吻合，型号一致度 100 |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Does not work | The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it. |
| D-02 | Context length | 32K passed | Read in full up to 32K; 128K failed: 未能提取文档开头、中段、末尾的关键信息. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Did not follow the schema | The response did not follow the required JSON schema |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio0.0%
Does not work
The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it.
Usage this run48.7KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens48.7KAverage per run9.7K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingDid not happenResultDoes not work
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 32K
Read in full up to 32K; 128K failed: 未能提取文档开头、中段、末尾的关键信息.
Reference windowVerified up to 32KThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 44.6K received
- 128K未能提取文档开头、中段、末尾的关键信息
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage218.3KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage157.4K-302.3KEstimated from this test's requests.DeviationWithin the estimateThe reported usage is within the estimated range.Usage checkMatches the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.