Identity confirmedModel verified
Confirmed as the official glm-5.3
Behavior matches the official glm-5.3.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (glm-5.3)100/100
Checks13/17 Passed
- Providers
- pomoai.ai
- Claimed model
- glm-5.3
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 103 official models
- Requests
- 18
- Duration
- 8 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CValidIndependent sample D采样 DInvalidIndependent sample E采样 EInvalidIndependent sample F采样 FValidReference103 official models · 2/6 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 2 match glm-5.3
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- glm-5.3Claimed model>99%
- claude-sonnet-5-5<1%
- claude-fable-5<1%
- hy4-preview<1%
- glm-5.3-flash<1%
02Test details
17 items · 13 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes glm-5.3 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 6 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加一轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the Zhipu GLM family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Match | 与官方 glm-5.3 吻合，型号一致度 100 |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Partly works | On average 24% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price. |
| D-02 | Context length | 32K failed | 32K failed: The endpoint returned no result. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Did not follow the schema | The response did not follow the required JSON schema |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio24.3%
Partly works
On average 24% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price.
Usage this run27.9KCached tokens5.4KNon-cached tokens22.6KAverage per run5.6K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultPartly works
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Boundary at 32K
32K failed: The endpoint returned no result.
Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KThe endpoint returned no result
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage36.0KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage157.4K-302.3KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation77% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
glm-5.3 verification report
Identity confirmedModel verified
Confirmed as the official glm-5.3
Behavior matches the official glm-5.3.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (glm-5.3)100/100
Checks13/17 Passed
- Providers
- pomoai.ai
- Claimed model
- glm-5.3
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 103 official models
- Requests
- 18
- Duration
- 8 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CValidIndependent sample D采样 DInvalidIndependent sample E采样 EInvalidIndependent sample F采样 FValidReference103 official models · 2/6 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 2 match glm-5.3
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- glm-5.3Claimed model>99%
- claude-sonnet-5-5<1%
- claude-fable-5<1%
- hy4-preview<1%
- glm-5.3-flash<1%
02Test details
17 items · 13 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes glm-5.3 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 6 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加一轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the Zhipu GLM family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Match | 与官方 glm-5.3 吻合，型号一致度 100 |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Partly works | On average 24% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price. |
| D-02 | Context length | 32K failed | 32K failed: The endpoint returned no result. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Did not follow the schema | The response did not follow the required JSON schema |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio24.3%
Partly works
On average 24% of repeated requests were billed at the cache price; the rest at the regular price.
Usage this run27.9KCached tokens5.4KNon-cached tokens22.6KAverage per run5.6K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingHappenedResultPartly works
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Boundary at 32K
32K failed: The endpoint returned no result.
Reference windowReference window 1MModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KThe endpoint returned no result
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage36.0KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage157.4K-302.3KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation77% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论