UndeterminedBelow decision threshold
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近，本次无法判定。
Brand consistency57/100
Model match score (claude-opus-5-5)44/100
Checks8/12 Passed
- Providers
- 999555999
- Claimed model
- claude-opus-5-5
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 104 official models
- Requests
- 11
- Duration
- 1 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CValidIndependent sample D采样 DInvalidIndependent sample E采样 EInvalidIndependent sample F采样 FValidIndependent sample G采样 GInvalidIndependent sample H采样 HInvalidIndependent sample I采样 IInvalidReference104 official models · 2/9 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 1 match claude-opus-5-5；another 1 match no model clearly on their own
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
These answers are not close to any official model on file. The percentages below only rank them against each other and do not mean the answers resemble any of these models.
- claude-opus-5-5Claimed model44%
- grok-4.529%
- claude-opus-58%
- claude-opus-4-53%
- grok-4.73%
02Test details
12 items · 8 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-opus-5-5 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 9 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加两轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 57; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 44; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Cannot be identified | Not close to any official model on file, so the substitute's vendor cannot be told |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage103.7KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage3.0K-90.0KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation15% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
claude-opus-5-5 verification report
UndeterminedBelow decision threshold
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近，本次无法判定。
Brand consistency57/100
Model match score (claude-opus-5-5)44/100
Checks8/12 Passed
- Providers
- 999555999
- Claimed model
- claude-opus-5-5
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 104 official models
- Requests
- 11
- Duration
- 1 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BInvalidIndependent sample C采样 CValidIndependent sample D采样 DInvalidIndependent sample E采样 EInvalidIndependent sample F采样 FValidIndependent sample G采样 GInvalidIndependent sample H采样 HInvalidIndependent sample I采样 IInvalidReference104 official models · 2/9 Valid
Answer by answer2 answers: 1 match claude-opus-5-5；another 1 match no model clearly on their own
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
These answers are not close to any official model on file. The percentages below only rank them against each other and do not mean the answers resemble any of these models.
- claude-opus-5-5Claimed model44%
- grok-4.529%
- claude-opus-58%
- claude-opus-4-53%
- grok-4.73%
02Test details
12 items · 8 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-opus-5-5 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 2 / 9 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加两轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 57; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 44; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Cannot be identified | Not close to any official model on file, so the substitute's vendor cannot be told |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage103.7KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage3.0K-90.0KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation15% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论