Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近,本次无法判定。
- Providers
- 福利AI
- Claimed model
- glm-5.3-flash
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 104 official models
- Requests
- 12
- Duration
- 11 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceAnswer by answer7 answers: 1 match glm-5.3-flash;another 6 match no model clearly on their own
These answers are not close to any official model on file. The percentages below only rank them against each other and do not mean the answers resemble any of these models.
- glm-5.3-flashClaimed model38%
- claude-fable-5-125%
- claude-fable-510%
- glm-5.33%
- claude-opus-4-83%
02Test details
12 items · 8 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes glm-5.3-flash |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 7 / 9 valid | 首轮未能判定,已追加两轮;部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 41; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 38; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Cannot be identified | Not close to any official model on file, so the substitute's vendor cannot be told |
03Which apps can connect
Tried once per app with glm-5.3-flash, the way each app connectsUsing this test’s address, key and model, we test responses and tool calls in each app’s API format. We do not launch the apps or test installation, sign-in or complete tasks.
| Software | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Codex | Didn't connect | This API route was not found. Check the address for this app, or ask the provider whether it is supported(HTTP 404)Connected the way Codex does (OpenAI Responses format) |
| Cherry Studio, Chatbox, LobeChat, Open WebUI, Cline | Connects | Replied normally and called the toolConnected the way Cherry Studio and similar apps do (OpenAI-compatible format) |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhenglm-5.3-flash verification report
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近,本次无法判定。
- Providers
- 福利AI
- Claimed model
- glm-5.3-flash
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 104 official models
- Requests
- 12
- Duration
- 11 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceAnswer by answer7 answers: 1 match glm-5.3-flash;another 6 match no model clearly on their own
These answers are not close to any official model on file. The percentages below only rank them against each other and do not mean the answers resemble any of these models.
- glm-5.3-flashClaimed model38%
- claude-fable-5-125%
- claude-fable-510%
- glm-5.33%
- claude-opus-4-83%
02Test details
12 items · 8 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes glm-5.3-flash |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 7 / 9 valid | 首轮未能判定,已追加两轮;部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 41; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 38; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Cannot be identified | Not close to any official model on file, so the substitute's vendor cannot be told |
03Which apps can connect
Tried once per app with glm-5.3-flash, the way each app connectsUsing this test’s address, key and model, we test responses and tool calls in each app’s API format. We do not launch the apps or test installation, sign-in or complete tasks.
| Software | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Codex | Didn't connect | This API route was not found. Check the address for this app, or ask the provider whether it is supported(HTTP 404)Connected the way Codex does (OpenAI Responses format) |
| Cherry Studio, Chatbox, LobeChat, Open WebUI, Cline | Connects | Replied normally and called the toolConnected the way Cherry Studio and similar apps do (OpenAI-compatible format) |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
发表评论