A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。
UndeterminedBelow decision threshold
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近，本次无法判定。
Brand consistency71/100
Model match score (claude-opus-5-5)62/100
Checks8/12 Passed
- Providers
- Coneverse AI
- Claimed model
- claude-opus-5-5
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 105 official models
- Requests
- 9
- Duration
- 13 秒
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CInvalidIndependent sample D采样 DInvalidIndependent sample E采样 EInvalidIndependent sample F采样 FInvalidReference105 official models · 1/6 Valid
Answer by answer1 answers: 1 match claude-opus-5-5
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- claude-opus-5-5Claimed model62%
- kimi-k38%
- claude-fable-5-17%
- hy36%
- gpt-5.6-sol4%
02Test details
12 items · 8 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-opus-5-5 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 1 / 6 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加一轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 71; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 62; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Needs attention | Similarity to other brands' models totals about 29% |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage1.4KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage3.0K-90.0KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation55% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
claude-opus-5-5 verification report
A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。
UndeterminedBelow decision threshold
Identity could not be determined this time
行为特征与已收录的官方型号均不够接近，本次无法判定。
Brand consistency71/100
Model match score (claude-opus-5-5)62/100
Checks8/12 Passed
- Providers
- Coneverse AI
- Claimed model
- claude-opus-5-5
- Plan
- Standard verification
- Reference
- 105 official models
- Requests
- 9
- Duration
- 13 秒
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AInvalidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CInvalidIndependent sample D采样 DInvalidIndependent sample E采样 EInvalidIndependent sample F采样 FInvalidReference105 official models · 1/6 Valid
Answer by answer1 answers: 1 match claude-opus-5-5
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- claude-opus-5-5Claimed model62%
- kimi-k38%
- claude-fable-5-17%
- hy36%
- gpt-5.6-sol4%
02Test details
12 items · 8 passed · 4 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes claude-opus-5-5 |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 1 / 6 valid | 首轮未能判定，已追加一轮；部分采样结果不可用于比对 |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Pending review | Brand match score 71; below the decision threshold |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Undetermined | Model match score 62; below the decision threshold |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | Needs attention | Similarity to other brands' models totals about 29% |
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage1.4KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage3.0K-90.0KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation55% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Reviews
还没有人评论，来写第一条。
发表评论