Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

kimi-k2.7-code deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR20260708074910250E17Generated at 2026/07/08 15:49

Matched with issues

kimi-k2.7-code deep verification result: Matched with issues (77/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Model-specific boundary response was unclear.

77Consistency score

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;模型专属边界表达不清。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelKimi K2.7 Code
ProvidersInfistar
Samples110 probes
Duration3 min 20 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage220.3KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.0KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment169% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share195.5%
缓存字段表现稳定

多次测试均返回缓存 Token,说明这条链路的长对话用量记录有参考价值。

Observed tokens13.7KCached tokens26.7KNon-cached tokens0Average per run2.7K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 198.4%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K198.4%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 195.3%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K195.3%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 195.5%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K195.5%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 196.3%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K196.3%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 192.0%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.8K192.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

4 samples
Verified up to 200K

All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 256KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues77/100

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;模型专属边界表达不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match12 / 18
模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -6
Core capabilities and model-specific tests12 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -10模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -3
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability21 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

21 checks
Model list visibility

kimi-k2.7-code is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 522
Cached tokens: 104
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 79
Cached tokens: 38
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 68
Cached tokens: 48
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 195
Cached tokens: 102
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 154
Cached tokens: 78
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 299
Cached tokens: 102
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 113
Cached tokens: 60
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.2K
Cached tokens: 334
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 164
Cached tokens: 112
品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 133
Cached tokens: 106
深度品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 833
Cached tokens: 122
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 142
Cached tokens: 144
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 163
Cached tokens: 118
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型专属边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 13.7K
Cached tokens: 26.7K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 16.6K
Cached tokens: 33.0K
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 33.2K
Cached tokens: 65.9K
专项:100K 上下文能力实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 51.0K
Cached tokens: 101.5K
专项:200K 上下文能力实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 101.6K
Cached tokens: 203.0K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

kimi-k2.7-code deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR20260708074910250E17Generated at2026/07/08 15:49
Model consistency score

Matched with issues

kimi-k2.7-code deep verification result: Matched with issues (77/100). Main deductions: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable; Model-specific boundary response was unclear.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelKimi K2.7 Code
ProvidersInfistar
Samples110
Duration3 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage220.3KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate82.0KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment169% aboveMeasured token usage is above the estimate; review billing or provider logs.Usage conclusionAbove estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
Token cache usage test

Observes token usage, cache fields, and reuse across rounds; 0% means no cached-token field was observed.

Tested 5 times
Observed cache share195.5%
缓存字段表现稳定

多次测试均返回缓存 Token,说明这条链路的长对话用量记录有参考价值。

Observed tokens13.7KCached tokens26.7KNon-cached tokens0Average per run2.7K
Token usage recordReturnedCache fieldObservedResultNormal
Cache share by testRepresents the API-reported cache share, not the final billing discount.
100%75%50%25%01次:缓存 Token 占比 198.4%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K198.4%1times2次:缓存 Token 占比 195.3%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K195.3%2times3次:缓存 Token 占比 195.5%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K195.5%3times4次:缓存 Token 占比 196.3%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.7K196.3%4times5次:缓存 Token 占比 192.0%,缓存 Token 5.3K,观测 Token 2.8K192.0%5times
Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

4 samples
Verified up to 200K

All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 256KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32K / 64K / 100K / 200KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues77/100

主要扣分项:逻辑网格推理不稳定;模型专属边界表达不清。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure12 / 12
No deductions
Identity and model match12 / 18
模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -6
Core capabilities and model-specific tests12 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -10模型专属边界表达不清(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -3
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability21 / 25
逻辑网格推理不稳定(深度题:逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

21 checks
Model list visibility

kimi-k2.7-code is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 522
Cached tokens: 104
Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 79
Cached tokens: 38
Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 68
Cached tokens: 48
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 195
Cached tokens: 102
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 154
Cached tokens: 78
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 299
Cached tokens: 102
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 113
Cached tokens: 60
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:逻辑网格推理不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.2K
Cached tokens: 334
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 164
Cached tokens: 112
品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 133
Cached tokens: 106
深度品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:Kimi 长上下文证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 833
Cached tokens: 122
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 142
Cached tokens: 144
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 163
Cached tokens: 118
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行 模型级题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:模型专属边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds

Specialty test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: token cache usage over 5 rounds
Status: Passed
Samples: 5
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Token cache usage test (may affect real billing)
Results: Passed 5 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 13.7K
Cached tokens: 26.7K
Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 16.6K
Cached tokens: 33.0K
专项:64K 上下文能力实测

64K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:64K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 64K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 33.2K
Cached tokens: 65.9K
专项:100K 上下文能力实测

100K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:100K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 100K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 51.0K
Cached tokens: 101.5K
专项:200K 上下文能力实测

200K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 专项:200K 上下文能力实测
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 200K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 101.6K
Cached tokens: 203.0K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video