Is deepseek-v4-pro genuine? Standard check result
Highly matched
deepseek-v4-pro 本次标准验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
All primary checks passed in this run.
deepseek-v4-pro 本次标准验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
All primary checks passed in this run.
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
All primary checks passed in this run.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.
deepseek-v4-pro is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 518 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 43 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 76 tokens
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 97 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 72 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 104 tokens
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 59 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 123 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 122 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 135 tokens
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 13.6K tokens of which 8.2K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 17.5K tokens of which 17.3K tokens were billed at the cache price
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 34.9K tokens
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 53.5K tokens
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 107.0K tokens
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 213.7K tokens
800K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 800K This test used 427.2K tokens of which 427.0K tokens were billed at the cache price
1M 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 1M This test used 550.5K tokens
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhendeepseek-v4-pro 本次标准验真结果:Highly matched(100/100)。本轮主要检测项均已Passed。
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Several runs in a row to see whether repeated content is billed at the cheaper cache rate; 0% means no cache discount this time.
Caching was used, but only a little; check your bill to see how much it really saves.
We test how much it can read at once, then compare that with the officially stated length.
All tested context tiers (32K / 64K / 100K / 200K / 400K / 800K / 1M) returned reliably.
Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.
All primary checks passed in this run.
Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed
deepseek-v4-pro is visible in the API model list.
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 518 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 43 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 76 tokens
按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 97 tokens
用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 72 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 104 tokens
核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 59 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 123 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 122 tokens
Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. This test used 135 tokens
针对这个模型再做一项专门检测。 5 次都对。
This test ran 5 times: 5 passed. This test used 13.6K tokens of which 8.2K tokens were billed at the cache price
32K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 32K This test used 17.5K tokens of which 17.3K tokens were billed at the cache price
64K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 64K This test used 34.9K tokens
100K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 100K This test used 53.5K tokens
200K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 200K This test used 107.0K tokens
400K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 400K This test used 213.7K tokens
800K 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 800K This test used 427.2K tokens of which 427.0K tokens were billed at the cache price
1M 长度的内容能稳定读完,这就是本次上下文实测的依据。
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed. Content length used: 1M This test used 550.5K tokens
还没有人评论,来写第一条。
发表评论