Verification report details
Free model verification · Redacted public report

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202607100536354DDF47Generated at 2026/07/10 13:36

Matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Matched (85/100). Main deductions: API service error; Several key evidence items need review.

85Consistency score

主要扣分项:接口服务异常;多个关键证据项需要复核。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGLM-5.2
ProvidersInfistar
Samples101 probes
Duration4 min 28 sec
Verification versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage6.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate12.5KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment52% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched85/100

主要扣分项:接口服务异常;多个关键证据项需要复核。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
接口服务异常(标准题:指令跟随、标准题:JSON 结构) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability14 / 25
接口服务异常(标准题:指令跟随、标准题:JSON 结构) -8多个关键证据项需要复核 -3

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

16 checks
Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 270
Standard test: instruction following

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: JSON structure

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:protocol。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 423
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 204
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 429
品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 644
深度品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.8K
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 395
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 238
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 865

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video
MozhenzhenAI service research and model verification report
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Free model verification · Supports all text models

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202607100536354DDF47Generated at2026/07/10 13:36
Model consistency score

Matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Matched (85/100). Main deductions: API service error; Several key evidence items need review.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen
Tested modelGLM-5.2
ProvidersInfistar
Samples101
Duration4 min
Test versionV11
Identity verdictVerified
Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage6.0KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate12.5KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment52% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.
A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched85/100

主要扣分项:接口服务异常;多个关键证据项需要复核。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10
No deductions
Protocol and response structure8 / 12
接口服务异常(标准题:指令跟随、标准题:JSON 结构) -4
Identity and model match18 / 18
No deductions
Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25
No deductions
Usage and billing consistency10 / 10
No deductions
Reliability and availability14 / 25
接口服务异常(标准题:指令跟随、标准题:JSON 结构) -8多个关键证据项需要复核 -3

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

16 checks
Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 85
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 85
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions
Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 270
Standard test: instruction following

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: JSON structure

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:protocol。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 423
Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 204
Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行 通用题,用于形成模真真验真证据,评分维度:ability。 存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因:接口服务异常
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0
Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 429
品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 644
深度品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: 深度品牌题:GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.8K
Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 395
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 238
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

Model-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed
Test evidence
Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 865

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating
5 points
Upload images/video