Verification report details

Is deepseek-v4-pro genuine? Deep check result

Report ID MZZR2026071008394418CCC9Generated at 2026/07/10 16:39

Matched with issues

deepseek-v4-pro 本次深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(77/100)。主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;这个型号该有的特点答不上来。

77Model consistency score

主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;这个型号该有的特点答不上来。

Tested byMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Pro
ProvidersConeverse AI
Requests101
Duration1 min 32 sec
Identity verdictVerified
ReferenceMozhenzhen's own test standard
A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage2.2KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage4.0KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation46% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues77/100

主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;这个型号该有的特点答不上来。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10
No deductions
Does the API respond properly12 / 12
No deductions
Is it the model it claims to be12 / 18
这个型号该有的特点答不上来(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -6
Does it answer like the official model12 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -10这个型号该有的特点答不上来(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -3
Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10
No deductions
Will it keep working21 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

16 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 464 tokens
指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 45 tokens
JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 45 tokens
标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 103 tokens
隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 165 tokens
品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 111 tokens
用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 69 tokens
逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
复测一致性

反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 170 tokens
DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 120 tokens
DeepSeek 推理边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 517 tokens
模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 123 tokens
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 163 tokens
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-specific boundary response was unclear

Reviews

还没有人评论,来写第一条。

发表评论

MozhenzhenBefore you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is deepseek-v4-pro genuine? Deep check result

Report ID:MZZR2026071008394418CCC9Generated at:2026/07/10 16:39
Provider detailsAI model details
A newer test record is availableThis report preserves the result at the time of testing and remains valid as a record. You can also view the newer report。
Model consistency score

Matched with issues

deepseek-v4-pro 本次深度验真结果:Matched但Matched with issues(77/100)。主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;这个型号该有的特点答不上来。

Tested byMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Pro
ProvidersConeverse AI
Requests101
Duration2 min
Identity verdictVerified
ReferenceMozhenzhen's own test standard

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage2.2KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage4.0KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation46% belowThe reported usage is below the estimate, possibly because of how tokens are counted or compressed.Usage checkBelow the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched with issues77/100

主要问题:复杂推理题答得不稳;这个型号该有的特点答不上来。

Can you call it, and is the model listed10 / 10
No deductions
Does the API respond properly12 / 12
No deductions
Is it the model it claims to be12 / 18
这个型号该有的特点答不上来(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -6
Does it answer like the official model12 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -10这个型号该有的特点答不上来(深度模型题:模型族专属边界) -3
Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 10
No deductions
Will it keep working21 / 25
复杂推理题答得不稳(逻辑网格推理) -4

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

16 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 85 times; result: Passed.
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 464 tokens
指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 45 tokens
JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 45 tokens
标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 103 tokens
隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 165 tokens
品牌边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 111 tokens
用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 69 tokens
逻辑网格推理

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Logic-grid reasoning was unstable
复测一致性

反复多问几次,看会不会答一半就断或偷偷换模型。 2 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 2 times: 2 passed.
This test used 170 tokens
DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 120 tokens
DeepSeek 推理边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 517 tokens
模型代码锚定

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 123 tokens
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 163 tokens
Deep model test: family-specific boundary

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-specific boundary response was unclear

Reviews

还没有人评论,来写第一条。

发表评论