Free model verification · Redacted public report

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202608120248135C9DBEGenerated at 2026/08/12 10:48

Matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Matched (86/100). Main deductions: Upstream response timed out; Failed evidence items were found.

86Consistency score

主要扣分项：上游响应超时；存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.2

Providersnextapi.store

Samples17 probes

Duration2 min 51 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage2.8KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate12.5KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment77% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项：上游响应超时；存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

上游响应超时（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability15 / 25

上游响应超时（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

16 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 283

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 173

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 202

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 316

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 285

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.1K

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 196

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Deep test: retest consistency

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：stability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202608120248135C9DBEGenerated at：2026/08/12 10:48

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Matched (86/100). Main deductions: Upstream response timed out; Failed evidence items were found.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.2

Providersnextapi.store

Samples17

Duration3 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

A newer report is availableThis report has been superseded by a later retest. View the latest report。

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项：上游响应超时；存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

上游响应超时（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability15 / 25

上游响应超时（深度题：逻辑网格推理） -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

16 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 283

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 173

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 202

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 316

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 285

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.1K

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 196

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

Deep test: retest consistency

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：stability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments