Free model verification · Redacted public report

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202608120300530BB421Generated at 2026/08/12 11:00

Matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Matched (86/100). Main deductions: Upstream response timed out; Failed evidence items were found.

86Consistency score

主要扣分项：上游响应超时；存在Failed证据项。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.2

Providersnextapi.store

Samples21 probes

Duration3 min 35 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Measured token usage24.7KFrom the response usage fields; this is the report's primary usage measure.Test-suite estimate33.7KPrecisely estimated from this test suite when no official baseline is available.Variance assessment27% belowMeasured token usage is below the estimate, possibly due to tokenizer, compression, or usage-reporting differences.Usage conclusionBelow estimateThis reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples

Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Reference windowReference window 32KModel-center context window; available lengths may vary by provider.Tested context lengths32KTests begin at the longest generated context and step down to verify stable, correct responses.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项：上游响应超时；存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

上游响应超时（品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability15 / 25

上游响应超时（品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界） -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

17 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 353

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 156

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 199

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 355

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 244

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.3K

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 188

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.8K

Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 416

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.5K

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

glm-5.2 deep verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202608120300530BB421Generated at：2026/08/12 11:00

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Matched

glm-5.2 deep verification result: Matched (86/100). Main deductions: Upstream response timed out; Failed evidence items were found.

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelGLM-5.2

Providersnextapi.store

Samples21

Duration4 min

Test versionV11

Identity verdictVerified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Long-context test

Shows stable responses at different context lengths and the model center reference window.

1 samples

Verified up to 32K

All tested context tiers (32K) returned reliably.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Matched86/100

主要扣分项：上游响应超时；存在Failed证据项。

Callability and model visibility10 / 10

No deductions

Protocol and response structure8 / 12

上游响应超时（品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界） -4

Identity and model match18 / 18

No deductions

Core capabilities and model-specific tests25 / 25

No deductions

Usage and billing consistency10 / 10

No deductions

Reliability and availability15 / 25

上游响应超时（品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界） -8存在Failed证据项 -2

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

17 checks

Model list visibility

glm-5.2 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 353

Standard test: instruction following

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 156

Standard test: JSON structure

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 199

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the protocol dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 355

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 244

Standard test: brand boundary

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.3K

Standard test: usage observability

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the usage dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 188

Deep test: logic-grid reasoning

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the ability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: logic-grid reasoning
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 1.8K

Deep test: retest consistency

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the stability dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Deep test: retest consistency
Status: Passed
Samples: 2
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 2 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 416

品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Failed

Test evidence

Check: 品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界 证据边界
Status: Failed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 0 / Failed 1

深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界

执行品牌题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: 深度品牌题：GLM 系列证据边界
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Deep model test: family-specific boundary

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。前序检测已确认上游响应超时，为避免继续制造无效请求，本项已跳过。

Skipped

Test evidence

Check: Deep model test: family-specific boundary
Status: Skipped
Samples: 0
Test type: Text test
跳过原因：service_failure_circuit_breaker

Specialty test: 32K context capability

32K context sample returned reliably and is included as evidence for this run.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Specialty test: 32K context capability
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Specialty: Context test
Context tier: 32K
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0
Observed tokens: 19.5K

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments